Feeds:
Posts
Comments

A TRUE REFLECTION OF AFRICA AND ITS NEWEST CHALLENGE

“Africa: Things Fall apart, can the center ever hold?”

 

“I will begin by asking this simple question: When will Africa be challenged to understand that they have reached a ripe aged to take care of its own?” According to one African thinker (unquote), “Africans never do anything right”.  Her statements were a surprise to me even though she is a full fledged African woman, born and breed in Africa with ‘African blood’ running through her veins, and jostling her minds and hearts”. I was further perplexed by her undermined critique of African people; both in Africa and in Diaspora. But, reflecting over her understatement, I came to some realization that there may be some truth to her overall argument about very intricate and mind boggling ideology of “Africans never does any thing right”.

 

Therefore, my reason for writing this piece is to challenge those Africans who never think that they can do anything right. Some people do believe that, ‘due to several struggles past and present by African people during the colonial era- between 1800 AD’S  and 19th centuries; and other historical struggles of racism, famine, HIV Aids, educational challenges, hunger, poverty etc,  that Africans relapsed their ability to become the best all over the world in all aspect of life and humanity. Many, as a result of this attitude have decided not to be innovative nor follow path with so called successful countries and continents to do what they did to be where they are today. Such as the united States of America, Europe Asia etc.

 

At any rate, how has it become a norm that we can not really unite in any way to bring positive contribution among us and our people who we left and decided to emigrate to North America and Europe etc? How do we think we can contribute effectively to Africa when we can’t believe in any thing that concerns it ranging from small community contributions, organization and formation of groups to facilitate economic, political, social agendas and growth? How do we think we can effectively contribute to the world at large where ever we see ourselves when we cannot think of the continent we once loved and cherished? Though, for those who have experienced wars, massacre, hunger, famine and so on while living in the continent of Africa, I may tend to understand the reason why you decided to turn your back to the country or continent that gave you birth and life. But how long can we continue to turn our back to Africa through our attitudes, actions, and life style just because of what we think we are gaining by living overseas or working with foreigners.  When, in turn, same foreigners respect and do care about Africa. The same foreigners have over feed you ‘Africa’ and Africans with foreign Aids thereby making you to become lazy to take care of your own issues both home and abroad. I understand that Africa had contributed so much to the undivided world success without adequate certain kind recognition; however indisputable this statement seems: my question is: Can a rejected continent continue to reject itself through its actions globally and domestically by not paying attention to others; and by not implementing policies that benefit its citizenry worldwide? So many Africans want to contribute to the growth of Africa and the world at large without action. It is not enough to sit down and write proposals of how Africa should be governed or how Africans should be treated. Nevertheless, it is reasonable enough to begin to be challenged participate actively in minor and major community pioneering and contributions, volunteer in schools, colleges, hospitals, culture, churches, offer aids to kids in Africa and so on as a way to uplift the good name of Africa and help those in need. If you find it very hard to give little of your time to making something out of nothing by helping your organization grow and achieve those positive visions and goals, how do you think you can extend that vision you have in your mind since centuries ago about Africa?.  Some times, we tell ourselves certain lies that keep on deceiving us from enriching ourselves and reaching our collective goals. We live in a very individualistic society; a society that is besieged by the invisible hands of capitalism that gives precedence to wealth, property rights, and under funded freedom of speech. At the same time, those in Diaspora have decided not to learn a lesson about giving and receiving. The west gives aids to Africa and at the same time, they receive hundred folds.

 

I am further overwhelmed how most Africans have decided to hide their identity because of ‘fear, ignorance, and complex just to be called western. I believe that we should work on becoming as western just to fit into the societal demands and needs and better serve the society in which we are living presently-Canada, USA, Europe. But, at the same time, we should hold firm our identity, cultures, traditions etc by participating in things that concerns us as Africans so that the society we live in can benefit from immense wealth, knowledge and ‘wisdom of Africa’. We in turn would be able to make the global world recognize our contribution whereby whatever affects Africa affects all.

 

Therefore, if you belong to any African club, organization, churches, company, firm, volunteer group, keep up the good works because you are writing your own testimony in many ways no matter how small it is. These so called ‘African universal dyfunctionality or disunity’ are a result of our inability to corporate at both domestic and global levels. The earlier we understand this notion, the better we will rise and make Africa proud and the world at large. The call by the new incumbent Chairman of the 53-nation African Union in Ethiopia, Muammar Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi this year to unite Africa as one continental government is a challenging one. In February 2009, upon being elected chairman of OAU, Gaddafi told the assembled African leaders: “I shall continue to insist that our sovereign countries work to achieve the United States of Africa

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muammar_al-Gaddafi).The idea is good, but how can it be achieved when most Africans allow themselves to be disunited in all areas of their live.

 

“I cry for Africa; when will you wake up! I cry for African Children all over the world, when you will understand that your continent is fading away because of your lack of commitment to better your people instead of allowing others to keep on giving you aids, food, clothing’s? etc. “Do not misunderstand my kind of cry; I love Africa and would want you to understand that Africa is a continent of riches, of gold, diamond, of kings and queens. Africa is a continent where true love, relationship; family etc can be practiced devoid of any mind game or sophistication. It is a true natural home for those who believe that things need to be done to bring Africa to a greater HEIGHT.

 

STEPHEN ABARA

 

President, Glendon Africa Network

York University, Canada

…………………………………………………………………………

“Things fall apart ….can the centre ever hold” (a phrase borrowed from Chinua Achebe the author of the Novel “Things fall apart, the center can not hold” (1958)

Born and reared in the Jacobite court in Rome, Charles Edward, the Young Pretender, or Bonnie Prince Charlie as the Scots called him, was in his early twenties, good-looking, chivalrous and eager to restore his family’s title as rightful heirs of Great Britain when the opportunity for restoration came with the outbreak of the War of the Austrian

english-school-prince-charles-edward-louis-philip-casimir-stewart-the-young-pretender-or-bonnie-prince-charlie

 

Succession in 1740.[i] Britain and France were not at war with each other: Britain provided aid to Austria and France supported Bavaria and Spain. The situation changed in 1743 when the British decided to send troops instead of financial aid into Netherlands.[ii] This serious military reversal persuaded Louis XV to plan an invasion of England with the aim of restoring the Stuarts, thereby ensuring that Britain would take no further part in the war. In 1744, Charles Stuart arrived in Paris, but a storm destroyed the invasion fleet and the plan to conquer England was delayed. In 1745, with a little help from the French, Charles had two ships fitted out for an expedition to Scotland. In July 1745, Charles Edward landed in Scotland, declared his father, James III, King of Great Britain, raised an army and, defeated the English at Preston-pans.[iii] 

   In reprisal, George III sent his oldest son the Duke of Cumberland on a campaign to destroy the clans forever. The steps taken to destroy the clans were barbarous executions, the eradication of clan culture and the imposition of martial law. Furthermore, the English felt that they had to get rid of Catholicism and destroy the clan system, in order to control the “savage” Scots, who were always presumed to be Catholic or followers of the Jacobite movement. However, Scottish society and culture was already blending with English culture, and therefore the extermination of clan society was a purely racist policy implemented by the Duke of Cumberland.

culloden

      Scotland and England in the eighteenth century were predominantly Protestant.  Most of England and the Lowlands of Scotland supported the Hanoverian succession, but there were some, especially in the Scottish Highlands, who remained true to the Stuarts, whom they thought to be their legitimate monarch, and eventually pledged allegiance to the Stuart banner.  The defeat of the Stuart army at the battle of Culloden was a severe blow to the Highlanders and the British policy was cruel and inhumane afterwards. The English intended to exterminate the Highlanders so that they could never again sponsor a Jacobite rebellion. The Hanoverian regime fully understood that wars and rebellions were funded by royalty and the rich banks of Europe. The reinforcement of major garrisons within Scotland and the execution of the captured officers would have been enough to destroy the rebellion.

   However, a policy of genocide was imposed on the Scots, and the Chiefs and peasantry were rounded up for slaughter.  In a letter to the author of the National Journal, the writer describes such indignation to the body such as wounded men after battles being clubbed and bayoneted to death; others were also castrated and burnt alive. Prisoners were also starved and kept naked within their own filth. They were denied medical treatment and their wounds were left to become gangrenous.[iv]  These atrocities were common in the History of the English people and their relationship to the Gaelic speaking people of Ireland and their cousins living in the Highland region of Scotland. These acts of brutality were only the opening efforts at destroying the Highland culture. The British degraded the native people even more by raping their women. The women living in the islands and Highland areas were obliged to climb and hide themselves in caverns that were somewhat inaccessible when they were warned of a planned mass rape—‘skulking in a starving condition till the men of war sailed away or marched on to another town.[v] The British policies after Culloden were about executing rebels; they were about breaking the dignity and will of the people. 

   Well into the second week of the aftermath of the battle of Culloden, the English   activities were increasing in depravity. It became apparent that the English were not about to stop the killings of the Gaelic people until their culture was exterminated from the Scottish highlands. These barbaric acts are not well known because history is usually documented from the conquerors’ point of view and there are no documents that depict the story of the burning of crops, destroying of cottages or killing of cattle. NEWTON1

   A month after the battle of Culloden, it was decided that the leading rebels would be executed in London.  Kennington Common was the place appointed for their executions and as the spectacle was expected to be attended with those circumstances of barbarity by the English law of treason, the London mob had assembled in extraordinary numbers to witness it.[vi]  These executioners were barbaric because they were ordered to hang the rebels, cut their heads off and disembowel them. This procedure was achieved by cutting the rebels down from the scaffold just before they went unconscious. The disembowelled intestine was then burnt in the fire. The heads of rebels were then stuck on stakes and the body parts were discarded like garbage. After 1746 they were no vivacious supporters of the Jacobite cause in England or Scotland.

   To an Englishman of the eighteenth century, and to most Lowland Scots, the Highlands of Scotland were a remote and unpleasant region populated by barbarians who spoke a meaningless tongue, who dressed in crude skins, worn out kilts, and who equated honour with cattle-stealing and murder. The Highlanders were a threat to the people of the Lowlands as Scottish history portrays the tale. In the thirteenth century, Scotland’s most famous patriot William Wallace was conceivably betrayed by Lowland Scottish nobles who had supported Edward I. All through the Middle Ages and into the period of the eighteenth century, the Lowlands were developing at a different cultural rate than the Highlands. The Lowland towns were similar in culture and industry with the towns of Northern England. On the other hand, the Highland way of life covered a system that was tribal, and very much similar to feudalism. At the time of the rebellion of 1745, it was understood that Charles Edward’s alliance with the clans showed no blood or kinship relation. This bond was an understanding that Protestant Britain was a dangerous enemy.   

   After the defeat of the Stuart army, the plan of the English was to eliminate the Highland culture from Scotland. The English government portrayed the Highlanders as one of the biggest threats to the Protestant faith. However, many chiefs were Protestant and their clan members were Catholic. The Highland way of life was more than religion; it was kinship and bonding under one banner which was one’s last name.  Every clansman shared the same last name.  From boyhood, from the moment his foster-mother weaned him, a Highland chief began to understand, or at least to enjoy, his peculiar position in life. He was of the same blood and name and descent as his people, but he stood halfway between them and God.[vii]  So after the battle of Culloden; necessary steps such as the banning of kilts, playing the bagpipes and the destruction of the Clan rituals were all important steps in eliminating the clan. piperwithplaid

    The Dress Act was part of the Act of banning which came into force on the first of August 1746 and made wearing “the highland Dress”, including tartan or kilt, illegal in Scotland.[viii]The banning of the Kilt was used to control the Gaelic people because the British government then turned around and recruited trusted Highlanders to wear a form of the uniform in the newly created Black Watch guard who served in areas such as British North America and Australia. The playing of the bagpipe was also banned in Scotland after the uprising of 1745. The bagpipes were considered an instrument of war by the British government. In this period anyone carrying a bagpipe could be subjected to the death penalty. The British allowed the Scottish Highlanders to keep their cultural dress and bagpipes if they joined the army. Highland culture was implemented into the British army to fight wars in distant territories and the kilt and bagpipe was banned in Scotland for nearly 60 years.

   These penalties could only be described as martial law. After the defeat at Culloden, the conduct of the magistrates was completely changed; and the fury of the soldiers and the people of the lowlands were directed at the church and Highlanders. Their chapels were burnt down and the gold ornaments and other riches were stolen by the British government. In the parliamentary session of 1747, several acts were brought forward and passed, for the purpose of preventing future disturbances on account of the succession. The most important of these acts were the, Episcopalian Act, the, Disarming Act, the, Act of Legislation and the, Act of Companion.[ix]    

   The Episcopalian church was the most powerful institution in Scotland. When the Stuarts lost the crown of Britain, the Episcopalian church came under from the Presbyterians, on account of the injudicious persecutions bringing upon the Presbyterians.[x]  The Presbyterian Church came to be known as the Protestant supporters of Hanover and the established Episcopalian church was marked as the religion of the Jacobites.Scotland-Chapel_Balnakeil_Durness

   From the Union of settlement in 1707, Scotland gained much freedom from Britain and the greater portion of the educated, the nobility and the wealthy had supported the Episcopalian church. After the battle of Culloden, Episcopalian churches were burnt and ransacked by the poorer people and the soldiers of Britain. An act was passed, less than three months after the conclusion of the war, by which it was ordained that any Episcopalian clergyman officiating after the 1st September 1746, without having taken the oaths of allegiance, abjuration, or without praying once, during the performance of worship, for the King, his heirs and all royal family, should , for the first offence suffer six months imprisonment and for second offence (upon conviction before High Court ), be transported to the penal colonies for life.[xi] Moreover a huge debt was put on the Episcopalian church, whereas the Episcopalian clergyman had to pay this debt before he could take up worship in this church.

   Episcopalians could not meet in groups of five or more individuals with ministers. This meeting would be classified as a church gathering and the gatherers were subjected to a fine or imprisonment. Eventually the bill was rewritten to state that no Episcopalian church was guaranteed the right to worship in England, Scotland and Ireland. The British government then decreed that any Episcopalian member could not run for a government seat. This act effectively killed the Episcopalian church in Scotland. Many of the members feared that they would lose their lands and titles if they supported the Episcopalian church. The Episcopalian church grew old with the Jacobite cause and the next generation after the rebellion of 1746, worshipped in the Presbyterian Church.  

   The Disarming Act was introduced to stop the Highlanders from carrying any kind of weapon; a gun, knife or sword. This act was changed to cover anyone living in the Highlands. A heavy fine was set and if the fine could not be paid within a period of one month, t he lawbreaker was transported to the colonies as a soldier. If the guilty person was a woman or they were too old to serve in the army, they were imprisoned for six months; upon release they were put on probation or watch for ten years. The gun and weapon laws greatly affected the Highland culture. These men were hunters and warriors. They could no longer hunt or duel amongst themselves. Their lands were stolen and on occasion some of their farm tools were destroyed because the British government believed they could be used as weapons. The Highlander was blamed for a war that originated in the royal prerogative right of succession to the British crown. This war of succession, which originated in 1689, was finally being put to a close with the extermination of the Gaelic culture and the subsequent assimilation of lower and upper class Scotland into the realm of Britain.

   The plan of the British was to destroy the will of all people of Scottish descent and to possibly turn the Highlands into a plantation colony, like they implemented in 16th century Ireland and lesser comparison to the slave colonies of the West Indies. Further evidence of the previous statement is found in the Act of Legislation and the Act of Companion. The Act of Legislation was created to abolish heritable jurisdictions in Scotland. It put an end to the Highlanders judging civil and criminal cases amongst their own people.[xii] The Companion Act abolished the right of ward-holding, by which the landlords commanded military service of their tenants. By these means, the last conspicuous feature of the feudal system was brought to an end in Scotland[xiii].250px-Pettie_-_Jacobites,_1745

   The spirit, youth and vibrancy of the Jacobite movement was broken by the harsh policies of Britain. Jacobitism was left to rot in an unmarked and unblessed grave. As the decades passed, the movement was long forgotten because all the rebels were now dead and buried beside that unmarked grave. Many heroes and martyrs were born during the rebellion. The most famous being Flora Macdonald (1722-1790) who disguised Prince Charles as a woman and guided him through the toll stations set up in the islands.

   In conclusion, the Highlanders loved their Prince and no amount of money could have persuaded them to hand him over to the British. He toiled in Scotland for six months after the battle in 1745. The policy implemented by the British is very similar to the occupation of Ireland. During the summer of 1690 and in the next twenty years, the English reduced the Irish to a condition of virtual slavery. The Catholics, who composed four-fifths of the population, now owned but one-seventh of the land. A series of penal laws kept Catholics from public office, voting, teaching, purchasing of land and many other beneficial things needed to succeed in life.[xiv]  A similar but more severe system was instituted in the slave colonies. The Gaelic Highlanders were the brothers of the Irish and they understood the cruel process of colonization. This rebellion was more about eliminating the Stuart claim, but more important destroying important factions that stabilized the country of Scotland.

   The most cohesive forces in 18th century Scotland were the Highlander’s and the Episcopalian Church. The Episcopalian church as its foundation in the Anglican Church, but the British policy was to take away this upper class Scottish institution from the people, so they could be subjugated further and become assimilated into British society. Britain has always had a caste system a system where Ireland and Wales were easily tamed. Scotland had always fought the English so fiercely. Scotland downfalls were its illicit encounters with Spain and France. In 1745, England had decided that her protestant lover Scotland had opened her back door for the last time to some dashing catholic despot. It was time she paid for her insubordination.         forres-findhorn-elgin-film-family-4042007-006-225x300  

  Charles Stuart was never to return to Scotland or raise an army again to support his family’s claim to the British throne. In old age he mentions in his letters the sadness he felt in causing such pain and devastation to the Highlanders of Scotland. . The court came to the conclusion “no highland regiment ever marched without a piper of kept alive in secret. in the eyes of the law, was an instrument of warfare” He suffered death on the 6th November 1746.herefore his bagpipes in the eyes of the law, was an instrument of warfare” He suffered


[i] Micheal Hook and Walter Ross, The Forty-Five-The Last Jacobite Rebellion (London, England: Stationery office Press 1995), p4

[ii] Ibid…p5

[iii] Clayton Roberts, David Roberts and Douglas R. Bisson, A History of England-Volume two  1688 to the Present  (Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall 2002), p452

[iv] John Richardson, Atrocities in Mid Eighteenth-Century War Literature: Eighteenth-Century Life   (Volume 33, Number 2, Spring 2009), pp. 92-114

[v] Micheal Hook and walter Ross, The Forty-Five-The Last Jacobite Rebellion (London, England: Stationery office Press 1995), p119

[vi] Robert Chambers, History of the Rebellion of 1745  (Edinburgh, Scotland: W&R Chambers Limited 1869), p443

[vii] John Prebble,  Culloden   (Ipswich, England: Atheneum 1962), p42

[viii] http://www.heritageofscotland.com/p,history-of-the-kilt,page.php  (accessed june 8th 2009)

[ix] Robert Chambers, History of The Rebellion of 1745  (Edinburgh, Scotland: W&R Chambers Limited 1869), p481-484

[x] Ibid…p485

[xi] Ibid…486

[xii] Ibid…484

[xiii] Ibid…485

[xiv] Clayton Roberts, David Roberts and Douglas R. Bisson,  A History of England Volume II 1688 to the Present  (Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall 2002), p409

The African Diaspora was the relocation of African people to the Americas and across the globe. The term is applied in particular to the descendants of the Black Africans who were enslaved by Arab and Portuguese slave traders and shipped to the Americas by way of the Atlantic slave trade. africa

Upon arrival in “American colonies” the African people came into contact with the native population who were to a lesser degree than the African people subjugated and enslaved by the European people. What is surprising to some readers to learn is that the greatest mixture of African and Indigenous people did not occur initially in either the Americas or Africa, but rather in European cities such as Seville, Lisbon and Valencia[i]  This contact has not been studied for a variety of reasons, one of the principal reasons is to dissolve the claim that Negro and Indian blood had established itself in the European genetic pool at such an early period in history.     

   Slavery was quite common in the Mediterranean world in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. In Christian Barcelona, one finds numerous slaves between 1275 and 1288 classified as Muslim of intermediate color, white Saracen and black Saracen. In the thirteenth century Barcelona had many Greek, Turkish and Russian slaves.[ii] The arrival of American captives in Southern Europe did not present a controversy. Columbus was the major supplier of American slaves prior to 1500. He sent about six thousand indigenous Indians to Europe.[1]  In 1770, Great Britain outlawed slavery and the slave trade ended in Britain in 1807, when authorities agreed with the growing number of abolitionists (those who argued that slavery is immoral and violates Christian beliefs) and outlawed the trade. In 1833 slavery was abolished throughout the British colonies as the culmination of the great antislavery movement in Great Britain.

   We have come a long way from the enslavement and cruel treatment of our African and Indigenous ancestors. Many people today categorize West Indians of African descent as African American. They also classify Indigenous people from any region as being Native Indian. This classification is based on their physical appearance, ignorance and their dilemma in history.  This journal is written to identify the differences people of African and Indigenous descent in the Caribbean and South America have with black Americans and Native people of North America. People of African and Indigenous descent have differences in food, music, experiences with slavery, language, and religion. The social, economical and political nature of each region has gone far in moulding these groups of people into distinct individuals.

         It is stated that two great mixed races have developed in the Americas. The one in which African ancestry is strongest we can call ‘Eastern Neo-American’ because it is most characteristic of the eastern half of the Americas.[iii] The other one, in which American ancestry is strongest, we can call ‘Western Neo American’ because it is most characteristic with areas like South America, Central America and the west coast of America. The two groups are similar in components but different in the order of the races. This subtle difference is a common factor in the social and cultural differences of the African and native people of the regions in the Americas.

   For example the people of African descent in Guyana share a similar Eastern Neo-American grouping of black Canadians and Americans. However, they are uniquely different in culture. This is evident in the cooking, and music. In Guyana and the Caribbean regions the most important food are rice, coconut and various tropical vegetables such as plantain. Rice and coconut milk is cooked with a variety of meats such as chicken, beef or fish. The most important spice in the West Indies is curry. All the major groups of people living the West Indies cook with curry. The spice curry was introduced to the West Indies with the coming of East Indian migrant workers.

  In America and Canada, the diet is not as spicy. Black Canadians who migrated to Canada lived on a diet of pumpkin, squash, potatoes and beans. This was eaten with beef, chicken or some other meat. In the Eastern region of America, the diet was potatoes, fish and lobster. In the nineteenth century lobster was not considered suitable for a gentleman to eat. Lobster was the staple diet of the poor people living in the east coast.  

   The type of food you ate depended on climate and availability. In regions of South America, the native people were excellent fishermen, moreover there were a variety of wild meats such as sea cows, laba, watrous and antelope. The indigenous people of the South American region also introduced other Guyanese to exotic fishes such as epapterus which is a prehistoric looking cat fish. The tropical temperatures only provided for more exotic foods.

  In Canada, the native population’s diet is similar to all Canadians. It was the native people who grew corn and squash. Moreover, the indigenous people hunted for deer, caribou, buffalo, fish, bear, and possum. In various regions of America and Canada they would hunt and eat different foods. For example in the South-western United States both the Papago and the Navajo Indians ate different things.  The Papago eat beans and rice just like the Mexicans and Hispanic people. The Navajo Indians ate tacos with meat.[iv]

   In looking at the cultural history of the Americas we must understand that it is written and dominated by white Europeans. Black people, of all shades, feel that their culture is not represented fairly. Black Americans declare that they are not like the other black people who migrated to America. Black Americans believed that they endured more than any other group during the antebellum period and the height of slavery in the 18th century. African Americans do not believe that other black groups such as people from the Caribbean, South America and Africa could identify with what they went through. Black Americans believe that these groups could easily live the American dream. In actuality Blacks in the Caribbean and South America experienced slavery and their native people were subjugated to a more or equal experience as the African American and North American Indian.  

   The black and Indigenous people from the West Indies and southern regions of the western hemisphere suffered and fought just as hard or harder for their freedom. The black Caribbean’s history is entwined in colonialism, the plantation system and slavery. Although Guyanese black people earned their freedom three decades before Black Americans, the black people in Brazil did not obtain their freedom until Brazil abolished slavery in 1888. Furthermore, the Brazilian government acknowledges to the United Nations that at least 25,000 Brazilians today still work under “conditions analogous to slavery.” The top anti-slavery official in Brasilia, the capital, puts the number of modern slaves at 50,000.[v] Also the working environment and economic condition is still an important factor in the development of culture and identifying regions as second or third world. North Americans are classified as super powers, whereas regions in South America, Central America, and the West Indies are rated as second to third world nations.West_indies_federation

   Hypothetically speaking, it is the African American, Canadian of African descent and the native population who has the advantages of living the American dream. Evidence of the previous statement was proven in the course titled Black Indians and Native-Black Relations in the Americas. This course had a large impact on my thinking and the way I viewed other minorities. Many people in the past century have immigrated or obtained asylum in North America. These people have escaped their homelands for various reasons, such as fear of being persecuted for their sexuality, politics, high concentration of crime and an understanding that there are better opportunities in Canada, America and the rest of the world.

    Diaspora is the mass migration of one group of people from one region to another. The African Diaspora is commonly identified with colonialism and the millions of African and Indigenous people who served the Europeans in the gold mines, sugar, and cotton plantations. In this world we still experience the pain and cruelty of Diaspora. In Africa and South America there are unmarked graves of hundreds of people who were murdered for their land or because they chose the wrong political faction. In Cuba a majority of the population cannot leave their island to vacation in some other region. Haiti and Guyana are considered two of the poorest countries in the world. Haiti and Guyana also have the highest mortality rate due to AIDS, malnutrition and murder. It is an unfair fallacy for African Americans and Native Americans to consider their predicament more severe than any other group in this hemisphere.                  

   Another important cultural difference is the music of the Indigenous and Black people of North America. The native music of this group is very different from the music of the West Indies. In the West Indies and Brazil the music is influenced by the African beat. Reggae is characterized by a heavy backbeat rhythm, meaning the emphasis of the beat is on, for example, beats two and four, when in four/four. This backbeat is characteristic of all African-based music and is not found in traditional European or Asian music. Reggae drummers also emphasize the third beat when in 4/4 time with a kick to the bass drum.[vi] Other influence in the Caribbean is Latin American music which refers to the music of all countries in Latin America (and the Caribbean) and comes in many varieties. Latin America is home to musical styles such as the simple, the habanera of Cuba and the rhythmic sounds of the Puerto Rican and the Andean flute. Latin music is routed in the Brazilian, Portuguese, Haitian, Spanish and Creole languages of the region.

   In America, the music of the black people is the blues. The blues originated in the deep south of America. The blues is the father of country music, hip hop and rock and roll. The term “the blues” refers to the “the blue devils”, meaning melancholy and sadness; an early use of the term in this sense is found in George Colman’s one-act farce Blue Devils (1798).[vii] The blues symbolizes the oppressed black man or in country music the jilted lover. All genres of music closely related to blues speak of drinking to ease the pain and violent oppression. Genres such as the blues have implemented melancholy and sadness in their music. It is the African American way of keeping their history alive.

BLUES_

 

 

   Another example of melancholy in a variety of genre of music is the country anthem of working in the coal mines of Kentucky or West Virginia. I believe that people of colour in the Latin Caribbean regions understand oppression, but they believe in singing about their heroes and romanticizing life. One only has to listen to the music of Bob Marley to understand that we black and native black people revere and love Africa and political leaders such as Castro, Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King Jr.

   In Brazil, and the Caribbean, the indigenous population’s contribution to music and celebration is entwined in calypso music, and other Latin music. The indigenous culture is prominent in the various carnivals of the West Indies and Brazil.  The music of Caribbean and Latin people is based on romance, sex and political freedom. The genre of blues is based on death, depression, melancholy and hard times.

   In North America “Pow Wow” is the Native American way of meeting together, to join in dancing, singing, visiting and renewing and making new friends. The Pow Wow is like a carnival or celebration. The Pow Wow festival is centered on the drum and dance. This festival has always been a way of documenting the history of non-white peoples. In America many blacks and native people to a certain extent do not celebrate their victories and achievement in music. Even the upbeat music of hip hop relies on lyrics such as a cheating spouse or a man or woman who is extremely well endowed to symbolize sex as opposed to true love. In looking at Latin and West Indian music, people sing and tell stories of their heroes. This is an important cultural and artistic difference between the two groups of people. We as Caribbean people sing and worship our heroes. We know and understand of the oppression of slavery. But we choose to leave that behind and not mire in the sadistic cruelty of slavery and the racist policies of the nineteenth and early twentieth century.

   In looking at slavery we have seen how the Island Caribs, Black Caribs and Garifuna were perceived by their Amerindian, European, and African slave neighbours. These people are recognized as heroes because they avoided being shackled in a period that had no human rights for the African and indigenous people of the region. Garifuna strength encouraged other slaves to form outlaw communities such as the Maroons in Jamaica. The Garifuna struck fear into the hearts of all who faced them in the Lesser Antilles and later Central America.  

garifuna-boat-arrival

   What is important is to know where and how Africans came to the Caribbean. Enslaved Africans destined for Caribbean labour were abruptly thrown onto the shores and to the mercy of the Island Caribs of St. Vincent, an island first named, and claimed, by the Spanish, then the British but thoroughly ignored by both.[viii]  The Black caribs came about between 1600 and 1796, not only from shipwrecks, but through Island Carib raids and maroons fleeing their cruel slave masters and intermarriage with other Caribs. St Vincent grew in reputation as a black and indigenous Shangri-la. The Black Caribs along with the Island Caribs and Garifuna should then be perceived as people to be worshipped by enslaved blacks, Indians and Abolitionists. The Black Caribs were traders in sugar, pigs, cattle, cotton and tobacco. The Black Caribs were capable sailors who transported their goods from Martinique to Trinidad in their great canoes.[ix] In 1763, St. Vincent was returned to British colonial jurisdiction under the Treaty of Paris, which ended the Seven Years’ War between Great Britain and France.[x] The Treaty of Paris was instrumental in the relocation of the Black Caribs to British Honduras which is now known as the country of Belize. The Carib’s culture is entwined with the French culture. Their names were French, African and Arawak and they drank wine instead of rum.   

   Arguably, Americans cannot perceive a culture of Black and Indigenous American people living to together and forming a cohesive administration that went against the inhumanity of slavery and other evils of colonialism. The two groups that could be compared to the Caribs and Black Caribs were the Seminole Indians in Florida, Oklahoma and the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma. Debatably these groups at any conceived time clearly believed that the African black slave was inferior to the red man. The previous statement is open to debate because history does tell us of The Seminole Wars which were the longest lasting and most expensive wars the U.S. had ever engaged in up to that time. The Cimarron or Seminole tribe was forced into the interior swampland of Florida. This community was never really defeated and the American government handed reserve territory over to the tribe. The Seminoles were a combination of runaway African slaves, indigenous people, and impoverished people from various cultures. The refusal to give up African American tribal members led to the first and second Seminoles wars and the place in history as a brave warrior nation. Today the black Seminoles are in a constant battle to maintain their status as full members of the Cherokee and Seminole Nation.1.1237962360.the-cherokee-nations-museum

   The African American and the native population in North America believe that they were the only groups to suffer indignation. It is the one negative characteristic that separates them from the Caribbean, Central America and South America. In quickly looking at native people in Canada and America, the major negative characteristic that differs from Aboriginal people in South America and the other regions we have discussed is blood quantum. Over time, blood quantum has become a symbol of who is or is not Indian and by what percentage.[xi] The government defines whether someone is a “real” Indian or not by measuring their blood. The number of generations of all your ancestors was pure-blood by the number of marriages with people who aren’t pure-blood. It’s a really bad way to define somebody’s culture, but it is the white government who implemented this law. It is unfair that a government can tell you that you are not Indian and you know that you are Indian. Being Indigenous is more than colour of skin; it is being a part of a culture.

   I am a Black Guyanese a few of my family members are Arawak Indians. These cousins are of black and Indigenous, East Indian origin. Moreover, they were raised “buck” and will always be buck {a term in Guyana for Indian} no matter how much black or Chinese or white blood they claim to hold. These family members can claim benefits with funding provided for them. In America, all Seminole Freedmen have attempted to receive benefits. The key point of the case is that Seminole Freedmen have been denied benefits based on their African ancestry and that Judgement Fund benefits are restricted to members with a Certificate of Degree of Indian Blood. These people are being excluded from the tribe because of their black blood.[xii]         

   In South America the language is predominantly Spanish with the exception of French Guiana (French), Dutch Guyana (Dutch), British Guyana (British) and Brazil (Portuguese). For example the Guyanese people predominantly speak English, but Portuguese, Hindi, Mandarin and several indigenous tongues are prevalent in the country. In looking at the Garifuna language, it is a mixture of French, English, some African words, Cariban and Arawak. The Cariban language as died out whereas the Arawak language as strived. The explanation is that the Cariban people would kill their enemies and take their wives. The women would then teach Arawak to their offspring. Evidence to support this claim is found in the tongue of the Garifuna people. The Black Carib’s language is spoken in Hondurus, Guatemala, and Belize. The language in Belize is known as Black Carib, but it is an Arawakan language with Carib influence.  At one time, men used Carib, lexical vocabulary, and women Arawak vocabulary, though both on an Arawak grammatical base, but this distinction has dwindled to only a handful of words.[xiii] 

    Another difference in language includes the fluid rhythmic vocabulary of the Jamaican people and the Creole language found in Trinidad, St Lucia, Jamaica and any seaport around the world. Creole is a language that was adopted to differentiate between the Upper class British and native people that they colonized. The Creole language could be natural to any race of people around the world so the British Empire was that large.

    After the Seven Year War 1756-1763, English became the dominant and only tongue for culture and business. In Louisiana there was a group of people known as Acadians who spoke a broken French known as the Cajun language. The Acadians were a displaced group from New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. In the southwest regions, Spanish was a striving tongue and in Lower Canada, which became Quebec, the habitants were able to keep their culture and francophone tongue.

   In researching the indigenous people of the various regions we have studied a similarity in decline; however, the indigenous people of the Caribbean and the southern region of the Americas are not pressured to relinquish their dialect and ethnic culture. In North America people are led to believe that native language is useless to survival and civilized culture. Nevertheless, language is the heart of a people’s culture. During the antebellum period and from the beginning of the slave trade, foreign languages and religion were not encouraged in America. Slave owners believed that the slaves would more easily be able to rebel if they were encouraged to teach their own language and customs.

   The most intriguing comparison is the movement of religion and the religious practices of the ethnic people coming from regions outside the territory of America and Canada. The religion in the Caribbean islands and the other tropical locations outside of North America can only be described as vibrant and exotic. On the contrary, religion in America and Canada was very simple and traditional. Religion as we understood religion was used to convert the native people of British North America. In Upper Canada it was the Jesuits and there extreme form of Roman Catholicism. The Jesuits forced religion on the native people and when they started to die of disease it was the native women who had blamed the Jesuits for bringing a strange omen and death to their villages. However, conversion continued and the native people were forced to set aside their own religious beliefs and values.

   The Jesuits arrived in Brazil in 1549 with the first royal governor, Tome de Sousa, and a new stage began: evangelization.[xiv] The Jesuit’s were used to bridge the contact between the European and Indian world. The Jesuit’s were closer to the Indian women and children in Brazil because they gave the indigenous women opportunities. For example the Jesuit policy in Brazil was to rebuke any Portuguese for having a large number of concubines. Many of the Portuguese settler men repented and married these women. On the contrary, seventeenth century New France witnessed the government, with the aid of the Jesuit “declare,” concubine and Indian marriages an abomination to European culture.6a00e54efdd2b38834010535ebc17f970c-500wi

   The Filles du roi, or King’s Daughters, were courageous women who were sent to New France by King Louis XIV of France between 1663 and 1673. They numbered over 750 and consisted of country girls, village girls and orphans. These young women of marriageable age and capable of bearing children were part of King Louis’ program to promote the settlement and increase the population of New France. Their transportation and settlement expenses, as well as a dowry of 50 livres for many of them, were assumed by the royal treasury.[xv] The idea in New France was to secure French culture in the region. When the British secured New France, Louisiana and the land west of the Mississippi the assimilation and destruction of the native people was even crueller. 

   Religion had more impact on people’s lives in North America. Religion was one way of justifying that the white people were chosen by God to rule the world and the people of colour. During the antebellum, period Americans fought to reform society in order to perfect America and its people. The leading reformers were Quakers who had for centuries fought for the African slave’s freedom. In the southern regions, the Methodist movement evolved and the Mormon faith was growing in Utah and the surrounding regions.

   The antebellum period brought about changes in attitude toward slavery and changes in religious circles. In the 1780’s, Methodists–who represent a standard example–had formulated strong rules against slavery, and slaveholders. Slavery was deemed to be “contrary to the laws of God, man, and nature, hurtful to society and, contrary to the dictates of conscience and pure religion.” The Methodist church even pushed for its members to free their slaves.

   During the early history of slavery, African slaves tried to hold onto their spirituality. These rituals and dogmas were variously described as Witchcraft. Whites were threatened by these “pagan practices,” and as a result, all blacks who practiced this faith were severely beaten or sometimes put to death and within a generation the African language and culture was lost in America. The only alternative to assure the slaves respected white culture was to preach fear into their hearts with religion. The slave master had wanted them to understand that a higher power had granted Europeans the title of the master race and they had wanted them to abstain from revenge.

   In 1831, fear was spread into the white people because of a rebellion that killed 55 of their own people. This rebellion is known as the Nat Turner rebellion. Nat Turner was a runaway slave.  Afraid for their lives, their investments, the civil peace, and the preservation of the South’s way of life, whites demanded–and their state legislatures passed–laws curtailing the rights of African-Americans to assemble, to worship, to become literate, and to do much more, except under strictly controlled circumstances.[xvi] At the same time, this fear and anxiety was producing an outpouring of concern to make Christians of the slaves in the hope that they might learn to turn the other cheek, and to accept their lot in life.

   Christianity was very much different in the Caribbean, Central Americas and South America. In St Vincent, the Black Caribs had implemented the use of the drum in their Christian religion. As stated in the article titled “These Sons of Freedom”, a drum was used to induce possession trance by ancestors, the “Carib” practice of a shaman blowing smoke on a patient’s afflicted body to extract malevolent penetrations, and “Catholic” baptism and images of saints.[xvii]  The Black Carib’s religion was based on holy sites, and using relics to heal, such as bones. The Carib’s ministers used the title Buyeis, which was a Shaman in the classic sense. The Christian religion of the Caribs was nothing close to the Christianity that we knew. It was connected with the Catholic faith, and African and indigenous people to the island. This exotic feature to Christianity is founded in the freedom of the Garifuna people and also the policy of the white settlers to give their slaves a certain amount of freedom to practice dancing and music which was incorporated into the Christian religion of the Caribbean.98326-the-tallest-wooden-structure-in-the-world--an-anglican-church-georgetown-guyana

   Much of the culture in the Caribbean island differed from Canada and America. We must remember that the territory of British North America had a larger white population who worked or benefitted from slavery, farms, or industrialism and expansion of business ventures in the Northern United States. Moreover, the white population was always smaller in the tropical regions.

   Culturally we have two unique machines of destruction. In North America, one drop of black blood made you first black blood, whereas the islands and Brazil had no one drop rule. There were people classified as white in the island who had a percentage of black blood. For example if you look white and your father was white you could be classified as white. Also your brother who was darker maybe classified as black. In these regions you were identified by how you looked.

   Therefore, people of a lighter caste were at times given special privileges because of a white father or Indian mother. Many of these children with a white father were able to travel the world and venture to other regions and live comfortably. I can mention names such as Alexandre Dumas who is still considered one of the finest writers of all time. Alexander Dumas mother was half black and his father was of French planter nobility stock.

   Freedom was also achieved by African slaves impregnating Indian women. The Spanish and Portuguese had passed a law that a child born from the womb of an indigenous woman could not be a slave. Eventually the islands had a large population of free Mulattos and Creoles who would push to marry lighter or white to move up the social scale. This was the case in Argentina; a country which it seems has few people of African descent.

   The period of colonization was very difficult for African, Indian and mixed blood peoples. The melancholy and anger expressed by black people can be understood. However, African American Indians and black people must realize there are horror stories dealing with colonization across the globe. In the 16th early century the Spanish soldiers in South America would routinely rape and disembowel the guts of pregnant women for sport. Further speculation could see the Portuguese and Spanish government fearing God and asking for penance-thus deeming the children of an Indian woman free for the debauched behaviour of soldiers of a previous century. Either way, pregnant slave women were not slaughtered in the United States. A slave was a very important and expensive human or commodity as described by slave owners.

Statue Christ Redeemer Brazil

Statue Christ Redeemer Brazil

    38 percent of the slaves were sold to the colony of Brazil to work in the sugar and coal mines. The life expectancy of these slaves was seven years. In America only the harshest sugar plantations of Louisiana could produce such a deadly comparison. Being a slave must have been hard in any region. Imagine not being able to choose your own wife or never seeing your child again. Imagine your daughter being raped by an old white man. These experiences are tougher to survive and deal with than a whip.

    Today it is sad to think of the West Indies, Haiti and some regions of Brazil, because they are many people suffering in these regions. There is little I can do to help my kin but send clothes food and money. The country of Guyana is one of the poorest countries in the world and Brazilian cities are known as the murder capitol of the world. Everyone would like to leave these regions and immigrate to America.

   Americans see other minorities as having too much but they have not witnessed real poverty, hunger and mass murders. America is one of the richest countries in the world. The African and Native people of America are some of the most educated and talented peoples. There are many African and native institutes that are of higher learning. On the contrary they are many people in these two groups that have chosen to fade away.

    There is an old saying that says that the sun never sets on the British Empire. In reality, at one time in our history the sun could never set on European colonial rule. I have learned much from this course. Mostly important I have learned to support people of all minorities. In researching this journal I have learned about the East Indians who migrated to Europe in the 16th century; these people are called gypsies. I have learned of the black woman of Muslim heritage who married a Medici banker and produced a black heir. We also talked about the people of the Americas who visited Europe and travelled to places like the Philippines. Research will also reveal black Roman soldiers buried in Great Britain. We the Black and Indian are truly a unique group to overcome so much and travel so far.    

DSCN0534      

   I found this to be the most challenging and uplifting course I have ever taken. In conclusion I would say that the history of the Cimarron community of Palmares was the most important thing I learned from this course.  The Cimarron of Palmares was the longest lasting and largest slave community known in the Western hemisphere. This community of ex-slaves lasted almost a century, and grew as large as fifty thousand strong. The capacity to survive in the hills of Brazil against continual efforts of Portuguese slaveholders to destroy the community is incredible. The fact that Palmares was also a multicultural community illustrates the ability of a socialist and democratic society’s strength under the shadow of a capitalistic slave regime. This community was unique and wonderful because much of the Muslim, African and Indigenous culture was kept alive in Cimarron culture. Today the Cimarron culture is influential in carnival, music, African Indigenous martial arts and fashion. The Brazilian women in this region still cover their heads and wear clothing that is central to Islamic culture. Finally, the shipment of people from the Americas as slaves beginning in the 15th century was the beginning of a laborious journey. I felt sad when I realized how vast slavery was around the world; however I was enlightened with the knowledge that so many people of colour rose up and fought. It is ignorant and naive for African Americans and Indigenous people of America to believe that they as a group suffered more from the people of African and Indigenous ancestry living in the regions of South America, Central America and the Caribbean.

Courtney Duncan.

Courtney Duncan

     

 

 

 


 

 


[i] Jack D Forbes, The Intensification of Contacts Trans-Atlantic Slavery and Interaction, after 1500 (Black Indians and Native-Black Relations in the Americas Fall/Winter 2008-2009 Course Kit), PG#37-38

[ii] Ibid….pg#37

[iii] Ibid…pg#56

[iv] http://www.blurtit.com/q258267.html (accessed July 11th 2009)

[v] http://www.mongabay.com/external/slavery_in_brazil.htm (accessed July 13th 2009)

[vi] http://worldmusic.about.com/od/genres/p/Reggae.htm (accessed July 13th 2009)

[vii] http://www.cnrtl.fr/lexicographie/blues? (accessed July 13th 2009)

[viii] Christopher Paul Johnson, These Sons of Freedom: Black Caribs Across Three Diasporic Horizons” in Diasporic Conversions: Black Carib Religion and the recovery of Africa. (Black Indians and Native-Black Relations in the Americas Fall/Winter 2008-2009 Course Kit), PG#105

 

[ix] Ibid…pg#107

[x] Ibid…pg#107

[xi] Ibid…pg#189

[xii] Ibid…pg#191

[xiii] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cariban_languages (accessed July 15th 2009)

[xiv]Nora E. Jaffary Gender, race and religion in the colonization of the Americas: Women and Gender In Early Modern World  (New York, New York: Ashgate Pub Co; illustrated edition, August 2007), PG#24

[xv] http://www.raysplace.org/index.php?action=filles (accessed July 16th 2009)

[xvi] http://www.wfu.edu/~matthetl/perspectives/twelve.html (accessed July 16th 2009)

[xvii] Sir William Young, “These Sons of Freedom” Black Caribs across Three Diasporic Horizons (Black Indians and Native-Black Relations in the Americas Fall/Winter 2008-2009 Course Kit), PG#108-117

Who were the pioneer women of British North America? “In general, they were the women of native and European origins who inhabited the British portions of North America that later became Canada. However, the approach of this essay is to focus on the female “half” of the United Kingdom migration of the early nineteenth century.”[i] These pioeer

women were Protestant, Roman Catholic or one of several other Christian denominations such as Presbyterian. They were considered the first European settlers on the land. The woman’s role in her village not considered as important as the man’s role, but they filled the vital operation of maintaining the first households of British North America. Each village had its own distinct cultural or religious differences. Some of the primary duties that were entrusted to women included milking cows, picking fruits, school teaching, working in factories and knitting. The children in these villages played and attended church together, and went to the same school. As they grew older, they would become engaged to or married to someone from within their community.

There are thousands of letters, poetry and newspaper articles documenting this time period in history. These documents tell a story of courtship, community bonding and sometimes family tragedy. The primary documents I have chosen to analyze are the personal letters in 1873, between, Margaret Thompson and William Donnelly. It is not difficult to realize why I have chosen these letters. “The woman    Margaret had chosen as her husband a member of the ‘Black Donnelly’s’, a family deeply embroiled in feuds so virulent that they had persisted through emigration from Ireland to tear apart the New World community of Biddulph with murder and arson.” [ii] In researching these letters and analyzing other secondary sources, I realized that pioneer women did not necessarily marry for love. They were important factors that ensured a marriage and courtship such as: the consent of the parents, the economical level of the young couple and the acceptance of church and community. This essay will explain courtship, marriage and the key factors contributed to securing a healthy relationship between two a man and woman in nineteenth century Canada.pioneer women

The determination and tribal quarrels of the Irish have been documented in historical readings that go back to the time of the Romans. The family of James and Johanna Donnelly emigrated from Tipperary, Ireland, to Canada, and settled on land sold by the Canada Company. The Donnelly’s were squatters; they had built their home on land already acquired by homesteaders as the following quotation shows. “In 1855 John Grace, sold the southern lot 50 acres of Lot 18, Concession 6 to Michael Maher for £200. However, the Donnelly family is still living on the land.” [iii]  That same year he is charged with shooting at Patrick Farrell, likely for some sort of squabble with the land. “In 1856 John Grace applies to eject Donnelly from the northern half of Lot 18, Concession 6. Michael Maher does the same for the southern half of the property. In the end, however, Grace sells Donnelly the southern half of the property for £50 –far less than the £200 paid by Maher due to Donnelly’s improvements on the land.” [iv]  The dispute was settled in court and the Donnelly’s were able to keep the southern portion of the land. “During a logging bee (rising of a barn) at a neighbor’s farm James Donnelly Sr. kills Patrick Farrell with a handspike. James Donnelly goes into hiding and a $400 reward is offered for his capture.” [v]  James was sentenced to be hanged but a petition for clemency orchestrated by his wife saw his sentence reduced to seven years in the penitentiary.

In 1873, the sons of James Donnelly started a stagecoach line. The stagecoach business was very successful for the Donnelly’s. In the spring of 1873, Margaret Thompson agrees to marry William Donnelly. Her father sends her away because he does not want the marriage to happen. In researching the letters of Margaret Thompson and William Donnelly, I have found that courtship in the 19th century was subject to various ethnic qualities and similarities. If the couple had too many differences they would mostly likely not be considered a good match. For example, the Donnelly’s were Roman Catholic and the Thompsons were Protestant. The principal objection to William Donnelly was his Roman Catholicism. The Thompsons were Presbyterians’ and Margaret’s father did not want her to have to renounce her beliefs. “The Thompson family also could trace clan members such as Edward Thompson on the Mayflower in 1620”. [vi]  The Thompson’s were a prominent clan in Upper Canada and in regions of the United States. This family had established pioneer villages in the areas of Scarborough and Biddulph Township. In comparison, the Donnelly’s were a Roman Catholic Clan who came from humble beginnings in Ireland.

Exchanging letters meant a “special friendship” that radiated love and romance, which led to marriage. The pioneer people believed that marriage was the alliance of family. Marriage could not be possible unless the heads of the respective families agreed that both households had the same economic, social and spiritual expectations. In the case of Margaret and William Donnelly, her father was more worried about the social acceptance of the proposal. William Donnelly was handsome, ambitious and somewhat wealthy. However, he came from the Roman Catholic part of the town of Biddulph.

Even as love became the basis for marriage, the role of parents in the mate selection of their children declined, but they still continued to maintain some control over the process.[vii] Courtship meant acceptance into a higher or equal social scale or plummeting to the bottom of the social line. In the 19th century, families of high social status were always aware of the situation of the future son-in-law or daughter in-law. It was always the father’s job to decide inclusion or exclusion.

In a 19th century letter from James Caldwell, father of Mary Caldwell, to the man she hoped to marry, William Lindsay, illustrates the previous point. In the letter he explains that he was not made aware that his daughter was courting a young man. “He states that he knew nothing of the matter beforehand (although his wife did, and he was bothered that this had been concealed from him).” [viii] James then states that a match with the Lindsay family was not the problem, but that the young Lindsay’s age and economic situation would entail poverty and misery upon his daughter and their son. Young people in this period understood who their parents would consider a respectable partner. The economic situation of the couple was very important.  Women in this period were economically poor: they depended on their father and when they got married, if they were working, they most likely relinquished that work to become housewives. Consequently, their future husband’s salary had to be enough to support the lifestyle they had been raised in.

Money was not the one and only issue in deciding if a couple would marry. In the case of William Donnelly he was wealthy, but was still not good enough for Margaret Thompson. In the Victorian era, working as a maid, barkeeper, waitress, or even owning a successful stage coach business excluded you from mixing with certain social groups. The economic factor also looked at the skill level of the individual and the characterization of the village. They could be farming villages, or villages associated with forestry and hunting. Moreover, pioneer communities could be found closer to the upcoming cities or in very isolated areas. In choosing a partner, the person usually mated with someone who was accustomed to their village’s lifestyle and livelihood. For example lawyers would most likely be found living in cities or villages close to the large capital. A farmer would most likely want a wife who would do work around the house but when needed to help in the fields. Women who met men who were not very well known to them would investigate the man’s character and economical situation before allowing that person to court them. Couples coming from similar economical backgrounds played a vital role in a successful courtship and marriage. However, as important as the family was in marriage choices, the church and community also played a significant role in courtship. 

Canada in the 19th century was mainly a place of small villages. These villages and towns differed by ethnicity, economy and religion. Communities were just as judgmental and nurturing when it came to couples marrying. The Charivari was another social ritual through which the community oversaw marriage. “The Charivari is a popular tradition in pre-modern Britain, France and Germany; it took root in North America during the early years of colonial settlement and persisted well into the twentieth century.” [ix]  The Charivari was a form of popular protest and a social ritual. Pioneer communities in the Victorian period could oversee a marriage by implementing Charivari. The Charivari was used when an old man married a younger woman or when an old woman married a younger man. For example the young man, by marrying an old woman, cannot have children with her; a strong working body is therefore not produced for the next generation.

There were other instances of Charivari as edited in the following note. “I am no friend to the blacks; but really Tom Smith was a quiet good natured fellow, and so civil and obliging he soon got a good business. He soon persuaded a white girl to marry him.” [x]  The marriage created a great feeling of negative emotions in the town. The young men of the town were determined to give them a charivari and punish them for the insult they had inflicted on the town. It was winter and the young men dragged him out of bed and mistreated him so badly he died from the wounds. The affair was silenced; and life went back to normal.  Charivari spoke for the community. Charivaris were also endorsed by the local ecclesiastical houses of each township. The custom of Charivari had dated back to medieval Europe. Charivari is an unwritten law and practice, this practice was entwined in British North American culture. All of the villagers believed in the Charivari law. It was allowed to develop untouched by the government for 4 centuries of European rule within British North America.

In Lower Canada, the Roman Catholic Church projected itself as the protector of the French culture. Archbishops and priests were very prominent at all government levels. In villages and small towns the influence of the priest was often equal or superior to that of the town’s mayor and police officer. The archdioceses were instrumental in maintaining political and social structures that “hold on” to French Canadian qualities. Because of the church, all French Canadian villages and towns kept their social identity. This identity was kept intact by French people marrying their own inhabitants.

In summary, the history of courtship and marriage holds broad implications for three further issues in the social history of the nineteenth-century. These implications are the rise of the working class, the women’s movement and the movement of new immigrants to the big cities. By the 20th century, the women of Canada had achieved much economical, social and political freedom. Women had a choice of whom they wanted to marry. They did not have to depend on a husband’s wage to survive. A hundred and fifty years later, the old factors still linger when couples take the path to marriage. However, the ethnic barrier has been crossed and society today can witness a modern day Heath cliff (Wuthering Heights) or Florentino Ariza (Love in the Time of Cholera) court a woman of a higher social caste.

 

Courtney Duncan

 

 

 


[i] Beth Light and Alison Prentice, Pioneer and Gentlewomen of British North America 1713-1867 (Toronto, Ontario:  New  Hogtown Press, 1980), p1

[ii] Beth Light and Joy Parr, Canadian Women On The Move 1867-1920 (Toronto, Ontario: New Hogtown Press, 1980), p115

[iii]  http://www.canadianmysteries.ca/sites/donnellys/prelude/timeline/indexen.html (accessed May 11th 2009)

[iv]  http://www.canadianmysteries.ca/sites/donnellys/prelude/timeline/indexen.html (accessed May 11th 2009)

[v]  http://www.canadianmysteries.ca/sites/donnellys/prelude/timeline/indexen.html (accessed May 11th 2009)

[vi] http://www.houseofnames.com/xq/asp.fc/qx/thompson-family-crest.htm (accessed May 11th 2009)

[vii] Francois Noel, Family life and Sociability in Upper and Lower Canada, 1780-1870  (National Library of Canada Cataloguing in Publication, 2003), p20

[viii] Ibid….p20

[ix] Peter Ward, Courtship, Love and Marriage in Nineteenth-Century English Canada (Quebec City, Quebec: Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data, 1990), p112

[x] Beth Light and Alison Prentice, Pioneer and Gentlewomen of British North America 1713-1867 (Toronto, Ontario:  New  Hogtown Press, 1980), p113

Our club has  been ratified by the York Federation of Students.

Check the site for the upcoming party in early May everyone invited catered to the T-baby All you readers in Dubai West Africa-Calfornia-Oklahoma and of course York University come on down baby we are moving on up. 

By being ratified by the York Federation of Students you will be
granted to a number of services such as:
? Club Funding (up to $600 per event)
? Free Photocopying
? Free Club Website
? Usage of Popcorn Machine
? Free Mailboxes
? Help with Opening a Bank Account
? General Help

Ratification forms can be found at clubs.yfs.ca under the section
entitled ?YFS Club Ratification?.
These forms were initially due on September 30 2008 however; as it is
the first year that these forms have been required the deadline has
been extended to Friday April 24, 2009 6:00p.m.
All completed forms can be mailed to/ dropped off to the YFS office,
336 Student Centre.

I strongly encourage you to submit the ratification forms for you club
to access the many services that are provided as well as to make a
smooth transition for your new incoming executives.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions,

Loveleen Kang
VP Operations
York Federation of Students
Local 68, Canadian Federation of Students

General Office: 416.736.5324
Direct Line: 416.736.2100 x.40536
Mobile: 647.895.2102
Fax: 416.736.5827

www.yfs.ca
www.cfs-fcee.ca

336 Student Centre, York University
4700 Keele Street
Toronto, ON M37 1P3

 

 

Remembering The Brits and the Euro New Wave Scene

The Specials video-link below.   “Ghost Town”

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZ2oXzrnti4&feature=related

 

Fun Boy Three video-link “The Lunatics have taken the assylum”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRNYqsMIbg0&feature=related

Fun Boy Three video-link  ”Our Lips are Sealed”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqQT3oKA3v8&feature=related

A muscian once said these words to me. He said “Count- AKA Blacula” The music scene is lacking. He then wanted to find out what the British invasion and new ave really was. The British invasion is still felt today in the uderground and lets say avante garde scene. Yeah Trash Metal, Euro Dance, Techno, and House musciv. Today so many musicians bite samples from this invasion-Only us Counts of the Cathars faith can educate you. So here we go-The Specials (sometimes called The Special AKA) are an English 2 Tone ska revival band formed in 1977 in Coventry. They have had hits in the United Kingdom, and their music is featured in film and television soundtracks. After seven consecutive UK Top 10 singles between 1979 and 1981, the band broke up.

The Specials-Coventry England

The Specials-Coventry England

 

In 1981 Fun Boy Three were a short-lived but successful English band which ran from 1981 to 1983 and was formed by singers Terry Hall, Neville Staple and Lynval Golding after they left The Specials.

They dispensed with the darker, moody sound and demeanour which they and Jerry Dammers had crafted with great success in the ska revival of the late 1970s and went into a much brighter, poppier phase with this new band, though maintaining savagery and wit within the lyrics and Hall’s wholly expressionless persona.

Together, they set about making music which covered a variety of genres. The band enjoyed six UK Top 20 hits, including the jungle-drum-inspired “The Lunatics (Have Taken Over the Asylum)” and the brassy, cynical anthem “Tunnel of Love” and created two albums of which the eponymous Fun Boy Three was the most successful.

The trio’s last UK hit was the song “Our Lips Are Sealed” from album Waiting, co-written by Terry Hall and Jane Wiedlin of The Go-Go’s, who had scored a U.S. hit with the song a year earlier. They then toured the United States and split afterwards.

  1. They were also credited with helping launch the career in 1982 of Bananarama, whom Hall first saw in The Face magazine. The three women provided credited chorus vocals on the hit “T’ain’t What You Do (It’s the Way That You Do It)“; the Fun Boy Three later sang on the Bananarama song “Really Saying Something“.
    Fun Boy Three

    Fun Boy Three

     

 

Hall went on to create the short-lived project The Colourfield, who had one hit in 1985, before forming less successful bands Vegas and Terry, Blair & Anouchka. He also embarked on a solo career and maintains respect from musicians and fans alike, with many acts citing him as an influence.

Writer-The Count Aka Blacula.

You Are Being Lied to About Pirates

By Johann Hari     

 

CNN Video Somali pirates

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6CofC_cd7s

Huffington Post” — Who imagined that in 2009, the world’s governments would be declaring a new War on Pirates? As you read this, the British Royal Navy – backed by the ships of more than two dozen nations, from the US to China – is sailing into Somalian waters to take on men we still picture as parrot-on-the-shoulder pantomime villains. They will soon be fighting Somalian ships and even chasing the pirates onto land, into one of the most broken countries on earth. But behind the arrr-me-hearties oddness of this tale, there is an untold scandal. The people our governments are labeling as “one of the great menace of our times” have an extraordinary story to tell — and some justice on their side.

April 12, 2009 “

Pirates have never been quite who we think they are. In the “golden age of piracy” – from 1650 to 1730 – the idea of the pirate as the senseless, savage thief that lingers today was created by the British government in a great propaganda-heave. Many ordinary people believed it was false: pirates were often rescued from the gallows by supportive crowds. Why? What did they see that we can’t? In his book Villains of All nations, the historian Marcus Rediker pores through the evidence to find out. If you became a merchant or navy sailor then – plucked from the docks of London’s East End, young and hungry – you ended up in a floating wooden Hell. You worked all hours on a cramped, half-starved ship, and if you slacked off for a second, the all-powerful captain would whip you with the Cat O’ Nine Tails. If you slacked consistently, you could be thrown overboard. And at the end of months or years of this, you were often cheated of your wages.

Pirates were the first people to rebel against this world. They mutinied against their tyrannical captains – and created a different way of working on the seas. Once they had a ship, the pirates elected their captains, and made all their decisions collectively. They shared their bounty out in what Rediker calls “one of the most egalitarian plans for the disposition of resources to be found anywhere in the eighteenth century.” They even took in escaped African slaves and lived with them as equals. The pirates showed “quite clearly – and subversively – that ships did not have to be run in the brutal and oppressive ways of the merchant service and the Royal navy.” This is why they were popular, despite being unproductive thieves.

The words of one pirate from that lost age – a young British man called William Scott – should echo into this new age of piracy. Just before he was hanged in Charleston, South Carolina, he said: “What I did was to keep me from perishing. I was forced to go a-pirating to live.” In 1991, the government of Somalia – in the Horn of Africa – collapsed. Its nine million people have been teetering on starvation ever since – and many of the ugliest forces in the Western world have seen this as a great opportunity to steal the country’s food supply and dump our nuclear waste in their seas.

Yes: nuclear waste. As soon as the government was gone, mysterious European ships started appearing off the coast of Somalia, dumping vast barrels into the ocean. The coastal population began to sicken. At first they suffered strange rashes, nausea and malformed babies. Then, after the 2005 tsunami, hundreds of the dumped and leaking barrels washed up on shore. People began to suffer from radiation sickness, and more than 300 died. Ahmedou Ould-Abdallah, the UN envoy to Somalia, tells me: “Somebody is dumping nuclear material here. There is also lead, and heavy metals such as cadmium and mercury – you name it.” Much of it can be traced back to European hospitals and factories, who seem to be passing it on to the Italian mafia to “dispose” of cheaply. When I asked Ould-Abdallah what European governments were doing about it, he said with a sigh: “Nothing. There has been no clean-up, no compensation, and no prevention.”

At the same time, other European ships have been looting Somalia’s seas of their greatest resource: seafood. We have destroyed our own fish-stocks by over-exploitation – and now we have moved on to theirs. More than $300m worth of tuna, shrimp, lobster and other sea-life is being stolen every year by vast trawlers illegally sailing into Somalia’s unprotected seas. The local fishermen have suddenly lost their livelihoods, and they are starving. Mohammed Hussein, a fisherman in the town of Marka 100km south of Mogadishu, told Reuters: “If nothing is done, there soon won’t be much fish left in our coastal waters.”

This is the context in which the men we are calling “pirates” have emerged. Everyone agrees they were ordinary Somalian fishermen who at first took speedboats to try to dissuade the dumpers and trawlers, or at least wage a ‘tax’ on them. They call themselves the Volunteer Coastguard of Somalia – and it’s not hard to see why. In a surreal telephone interview, one of the pirate leaders, Sugule Ali, said their motive was “to stop illegal fishing and dumping in our waters… We don’t consider ourselves sea bandits. We consider sea bandits [to be] those who illegally fish and dump in our seas and dump waste in our seas and carry weapons in our seas.” William Scott would understand those words.

No, this doesn’t make hostage-taking justifiable, and yes, some are clearly just gangsters – especially those who have held up World Food Programme supplies. But the “pirates” have the overwhelming support of the local population for a reason. The independent Somalian news-site WardherNews conducted the best research we have into what ordinary Somalis are thinking – and it found 70 percent “strongly supported the piracy as a form of national defence of the country’s territorial waters.” During the revolutionary war in America, George Washington and America’s founding fathers paid pirates to protect America’s territorial waters, because they had no navy or coastguard of their own. Most Americans supported them. Is this so different?

Did we expect starving Somalians to stand passively on their beaches, paddling in our nuclear waste, and watch us snatch their fish to eat in restaurants in London and Paris and Rome? We didn’t act on those crimes – but when some of the fishermen responded by disrupting the transit-corridor for 20 percent of the world’s oil supply, we begin to shriek about “evil.” If we really want to deal with piracy, we need to stop its root cause – our crimes – before we send in the gun-boats to root out Somalia’s criminals.

The story of the 2009 war on piracy was best summarised by another pirate, who lived and died in the fourth century BC. He was captured and brought to Alexander the Great, who demanded to know “what he meant by keeping possession of the sea.” The pirate smiled, and responded: “What you mean by seizing the whole earth; but because I do it with a petty ship, I am called a robber, while you, who do it with a great fleet, are called emperor.” Once again, our great imperial fleets sail in today – but who is the robber?

POSTSCRIPT: Some commenters seem bemused by the fact that both toxic dumping and the theft of fish are happening in the same place – wouldn’t this make the fish contaminated? In fact, Somalia’s coastline is vast, stretching to 3300km. Imagine how easy it would be – without any coastguard or army – to steal fish from Florida and dump nuclear waste on California, and you get the idea. These events are happening in different places – but with the same horrible effect: death for the locals, and stirred-up piracy. There’s no contradiction.

Johann Hari is a writer for the Independent newspaper

GLENDON AFRICA INTERNATIONA L CONFERENCE AND                   

                   CULTURAL FESTIVAL: APRIL 17, 2009

         

             PRESS RELEASE

 

The Glendon Africa Network presents its first ‘annual conference and cultural festival- 2009’ titled: “the development of technology and Science in Africa: a way to harness domestic and global economy in the 21 century”. This conference will offer participants opportunity to learn more about African culture, economic development and empowerment achieved through scientific and other academic achievement. Glendon Africa Network, formed in the year 2007, is an academic organization for all ethnic groups. It believes that knowledge is power, and aspires to educate the students and share knowledge with the faculties at Glendon about the continent Africa and its place in international society. It is the brainchild of Mr. Stephen Abara and other founding members: Marfo Bonsu, Nana Yaw Afriyie, Sinatou Bello, Noela Kitoto, Housseinatou Boiro, Baudride Mbaya and Adelton lopes who decided to find ways to enhance the multicultural interactions of students at Glendon College. It provides students of African descent and Glendon students with a more understanding of African lifestyle and identity. The club aims to foster knowledge about Africa through culturally appropriate arts, workshops, international conferences, leadership development, and sponsorship of disadvantaged African children.

 

The 2009 conference will provide Glendon students and faculty a unique social and educational opportunity to explore Africa’s identity and relevant issues. The speakers and the academia that will be present in the conference represent a broad background of experience in various fields. GAN wishes to highlight the importance of collective organization to bring about long term academic goals and development in Africa

 

The cultural activities during this conference period will focus on performance and visual arts to covey our message of peace, unity and African vibrancy. We will enlist the skills of artists, poets, drum groups, recognized cultural speakers who represent the dynamic history and positive development of the African people. 

 

Conference inaugural speech will be given by the principle of Glendon, Prof. Kenneth McRoberts. The event is co-sponsored by Harriet Tubman centre –Keele, and Human rights department. 

 

GAN Membership has remained dedicated to the success of the club.  We encourage new membership yearly. The event begins at 12pm and ends at 5pm.

 

Location: Glendon College, café, York University, Canada.

 

Stephen Abara

President, Glendon Africa Network

Tel: 647-285-0278

E-mail: gan@glendon.yorku.ca

Web: http //www.glendonafrica.wordpress.com

 


 
LA CONFÉRENCE CULTURELLE INTERNATIONALE AFRICAINE DU COLLEGE GLENGON : LE 17 AVRIL 2009

                                     

                 

                                                 COMMUNIQUÉ DE PRESSE

 

Le Réseau Africain Glendon vous présente sa première conférence annuelle sous forme d’un festival culturel intitulé : « le développement de la technologie et de la Science en Afrique ».

 

Nous essayerons d’analyser et si possible apporter les solutions aux causes qui empêchent  la montée économique Africaine au niveau mondiale et domestique au 21er siècle”.

 

Cette conférence offrira également l’opportunité aux participants d’apprendre d’avantage sur la culture africaine.

 

Le Réseau Africain Glendon formé en 2007 par l’initiative de monsieur Stephen Abara étudiant aux relations internationales à Glendon, est une organisation qui accepte des membres venant de tous les groupes ethniques selon les normes des associations du collège Glendon.

 

Le but principal de cette association est de pourvoir enseigner et d’apporter des écclaircissements aux étudiants du collège Glendon concernant le continent Africain et son importance dans la communauté internationale.

 

Ormis les activités culturel et de sensibilisation, le club souhaiterait également  sponsoriser les enfants défavorisés en africain.

 

La conférence du 17 avril 2009 donnerait  une opportunité aux étudiants de Glendon ainsi qu’a nos invités de parler de long et en large de l’Afrique.

 

GAN veut accentuer l’importance d’organisation collective pour provoquer les résultats positifs à long terme pour le développement de l’Afrique.

 

Les activités culturelles pendant cette période de conférence se concentreront sur la performance et les arts visuels pour accompagner notre message de paix, d’unité et de vitalité africaine.

 

Le discours d’inauguration de la conférence sera donné par le principe de Glendon, Prof. Kenneth McRoberts.

 

Cet événement est sponsorisé par le centre  Harriet Tubman-Keele et le département de Droits de l’homme.

 

La conférence aura lieu à la caféteria du collège Glendon de 12pm à 5pm.

SOYEZ DE NOTRE.

 

Stephen Abara

Le président, Glendon le Réseau d’Afrique

Tél : 647-285-0278

E-mail : gan@glendon.yorku.ca

Web: http // www.glendonafrica.wordpress.com

Travel Guyana The Beautiful Land of  Many Waters:

Guyanese-conference-centre

Guyana is and Indeginous word meaning -land of many waters. Guyana, located in the northeast of South America. It is also one of only 4 non Spanish-speaking countries in South America. Because of immigration they are approximately 740,000 people living in the country. The make up is Amerindians (5.3 %). Blacks (30.5 %). East Indians (51.4 %). Chinese (0.2 %). White (2.1 %). and Mixed (10 %). Columbus sited Guyana in 1498 But the dutch were the 1st Europeans to settle in Guyana  around -1616.

rupunnini-guyana

Economy

The economy of British Guyana was completely dominated by sugarcane production until the 1880s, when falling cane sugar prices stimulated a greater shift toward rice farming, mining and forestry. However, sugarcane remained a significant part of the economy (sugar would account for nearly 50% of exports in 1959). Under the Dutch, settlement and economic activity was concentrated around sugar plantations lying inland from the coast. Under the British, cane planting expanded to richer coastal lands, with greater coastline protection. Until the of slavery in the British Empire in 1834, sugar planters relied very heavily on slave labour to produce sugar.eco-lodge

.

Guyana is one of the poorest countries in the world today-however it still one of the most beautiful places in the world.

Iindian-hut-guyana

castellani-house-guyana

mount-roraima

kaiteur-falls-1

kaiteur-falls

harpy-eagle

orinduik-falls

jaguar

north-rupunini-guyana-rodeo

dscn0534

rupunini-river-black-caimans

murray-falls

 

roraima

rupunini-guyana

tukiet-guyana

simoni-creek

st-georgy

road-from-guyana-to-brazil

 

My name is Courtney Duncan I am of Guyanese heritage-they are many things to see i Guyana-exotic birds, wild animals hundreds of waterfalls, carnivals-big snakes-danger excitemnet-Guyana as the 3rd largest wildlife conservation in the world-number one is Africa-Guyana the beautiful the birth place of my parents

08

 

Courtney duncan     

 sexual-harssment

Many young people today do not realize that a great part of the activities in their social life could be defined as sexual harassment. The faculty staff at the various campuses across Canada indirectly protect the male harasser by not making a connection between certain forms of harassment, rape and sexual assault. The purpose of this paper is to explore why various forms of sexual misconduct have become so widespread or prevalent. The factors that contribute to sexual harassment on campus are our aggressive culture, the inexperience of  first year students and the power of the instructor along with the actions of the women remaining silent to avoid the negative attention of being being singled out. These are also the main reasons that sexual harassment goes undetected within our campus community.    

   This essay will also consist of a questionnaire whose findings will be compared to the findings of the government survey. The findings of our survey will determine whether ethinicity and a woman’s economical situation play a factor in the increase incidents of sexual misconduct towards various groups of women within our community. The conclusion will be based on our research: for example should the blame be placed on our judicial system, our culture or the faculty staff at the various universities? Also do we have adequate solutions to this ever growing problem of sexual harassment on the campuses of our various universities and colleges?    

   Sexual harassment is a relatively new term and concept under law; however it is not a new issue on our campuses. According to Sandler and Shoop (1998), it remained a hidden issue in part because there was no name for the behavior until the early 1970s when a few women at Cornell University came up with the term “sexual harassment”. These women had to struggle to find a term to describe their experience because the continual sexual advances had caused depression and insecurity in their social life outside of the workplace and educational enviroment. (p. 4). Most women who have experienced it have trouble understanding sexual harassment. For example many women sense that compliments such as the professor telling her with increasing frequency that “she was the prettiest student that he ever taught.” On occasions the oral choice of words was changed to “the sexiest student we ever had”. Moroever, an instructor asking a student whether he or she had a  “boyfriend”, or an invitation to dinner, “so we can get to know each other”. These are all forms of sexual harassment that women find hard to distinguish or unconfortable to discuss. This is true because our society indirectly implies that sexual harassment may not necessarily be a crime and a woman’s assailant is always a stranger. The subtle comments of an instructor in a classroom or the touching by an acquaintance in a classroom-the casual stroke of someone thighs or hands may seem innocent to some potential female victim. Too many men and women think of sexual harassment as only anal, oral or vaginal penetration. According to stats Canada (2008), four out of five female undergraduates surveyed at Canadian universities said they had been the victim of some sort of violence in a dating relationship. The form of violence either took on sexual assault, physical abuse, verbal abuse and unwelcome remarks, patting, pinching, touching or finally rape.

sexual_harassment

   The survey produced for this essay was based on the reports of female student and working members of the faculty.  However, the results were similar-eighty five percent of the women answered yes to strange males giving them unwanted hugs or may have touched them on the leg or stroked their hair. From this finding we must make aware to all students what patterns and behaviors constitute sexual deviance.

 

   The questionnaire distributed at York University revealed similar numbers to the graph above,  produced by statistics Canada. The questionnaire is made up of 20 questions. The most intriguing question is stated as follows, “Has anyone tried to rub up with you at a dance”? A modest 75 per cent stated that at the various dances, young men whom they did not know-did-try and dance dirty and intimate with them. For this question, fifty five percent of the young women indicate in their answer that this form of harassment was more prominent during the Frosh week social activities organized by the student associations. At these parties, the University forbids alcohol consumption.  Despite this ban, some off-campus activities typically involve the consumption of alcohol and drugs and listening to various forms of music. As the day turns to night intimate couplings with experienced university students and freshman females is eminent.  

    Another social gathering at York is the Thursday night pub night. At this pub it is common to see young women dressed very provocatively.  At the various social dances it is the young man who usually makes the first move. He will slide up behind her grinding his crotch into her behind. If she is not willing she will just move away.  Although this action could be classified as sexual harassment or interference-this behavior is rarely reported. Bohner & Parrot(1993). Many people, including those who have experienced it, have trouble identifying sexual assault. (Pg.18)

    The York University questionnaire that was distributed to 300 female students indicate that one-quarter of all college girls will be raped or be the targets of attempted rape by the end of their college years. The assailants of these women are not perverted old men lurking in dark alleys they are the student athlete or regular guy sitting next to them in class or at the library. Statistic Canada survey state that 60% of the victims know their assailants.

 

 When a woman knows the man who sexually assaults her it is less likely that it will be recognized as a crime by the woman.  When a male student compliments a young woman’s body or grinds up with her at a dance without her consent-this is wrong. In today’s society this form of harassment is being ignored by both the male and female genders. Our culture has deemed this natural for a young man to try and take a woman sexually as opposed to getting to know someone with a meaningful conversation. Many women consider themselves more marketable or attractive if they are looked at as a sexual object.

    We are living in an age where teen pregnancy is the norm. The sexual freedom of the nineteen sixties was based on women making their own choices and becoming more independent. Sexual freedom in today’s society depicts young women as eager college sluts. The young people of today believe that practicing safe sex means you are healthy person. Moreover, a young lady who is not sexually active, is sometimes looked at as prudish and unattarctive. Therefore the compromise of sex for a relationship is the option for young women on campuses.

    Young people are also taught that keeping our sex partners to a mere two or three per year follows the best advice that modern psychology can offer. They are enjoying their sexual freedom, experimenting, discovering themselves. The author (Crittende 2006) states that “sexually active teenage girls were more than three times as likely to be depressed, and nearly three times as likely to have had a suicide attempt, than girls who were not sexually active.” (pg 17) This depression is a result of our neo Canadian culture-a culture that tells teenaged girls the best sex is safe sex. The idea of suicide is conceivable because many of these young women have now realized that they have given away something precious because of a night of drunkenness. Young women who encounter this problem feel intimidated, fearful, dirty and worthless. A woman in this state of mind will find it hard to conceive the criminal elements of sexual harassment.

     First year university students will be seventeen and eighteen years old. This group is at the bottom of the social scale because they cannot legally drink. They are in a position to interact with students that will be 3 to 15 years older than them. The older experienced male is at an advantage because he equates sex as lustful meaningless pleasure whereas the female gives herself for companionship. As a result of struggle of the sexes she may find it difficult to talk about one night stands with either her parents or the various departments of the faculty.  

 (Wilson 1997) This writer believes that less deadly, perhaps, but still very serious is the tendency of institutions to confuse/conflate acts of sexual discrimination with harassment. She further argues that women are losing these…struggles for justice. Ed. Note…full text of Ms. Wilson’s message can be found on the message log for January 1997. These struggles for justice are lost within our curriculum because the university realizes the danger in placing harassment within the context of a criminal offence such as rape. The only intention of a university such as “York” is to maintain the good name of the institute. The various universities across Canada will profit more by proving they have established a safe environment for our young women to study.

     The fears of sexual harassment and rape were originally from the rising numbers in the United States. According to a National Institute of Justice report from December 2005, on a campus of 10,000 students, as many as 350 women may be victims of sexual assault each year. More than 80% of these women were under the age twenty.  According to Currie and MacLean 2007 “they believe that 20-25% of women in campuses across Canada have experienced some form of abuse in a dating situation”. The abuse is anything from sexual assault to rape. Most researchers acknowledge the embarrassment of the institute in dealing with rape. If the various institute across Canada then decide to raise awareness to sexual harassment and the various forms of harassment, our numbers would rate in compare to those of the United States.     stat_02_03_2

    Sexual harassment is also about power and less to do with sex than is generally understood.  According to (Sandler & Shoop 1997) sexual harassment occurs in the context of a power imbalance where one person has the power to intimidate. (pg7). A prime example of this scenario is the professor or instructor who invites the student to his office for a chat and closes the door. The harassment between instructor and student can be even more restrained than that. It could be an instructor complimenting a student about her hair, eyes or certain clothing. The harassment can lead to malicious gossip where students believe the pretty girl with the nice body who always seems to get good grades is sleeping with the professor. This assumption, made on mere speculation, as become a natural part of our culture.

   The York University survey that was recorded for this research paper indicates that 50% of female students believed that although this behavior is wrong the instructor has done nothing wrong unless he as physically touched the student or asked for sex. Moreover, they indicated that society would be more upset at same sex relationships and interracial love. They believe that a professor sleeping with his female student would be far less destructive than a same sex relationship or interracial relationship. What is the outcome of a relationship between the instructor and female student?  More often this relationship is a one-night stand, hot young sex or a romantic affair (which might end with bad feelings between the couple). The exact numbers for York University are unknown but in one university study, 26 percent of male faculty members reported they had had sexual encounters or sexual relationships with women students (Fitzgerald, Weitzman 1988). These women in return choose not to seek any help because they feel that they would be much to blame. Sexual harassment of students by adults is less common than harassment among students (AAUW, 2001) but is extremely serious, involving a gross abuse of power and trust. Occasionally, students sexually harass adults (AAUW), often targeting support staff members-such as teacher assistant, cafeteria workers, and janitors-who are perceived as less powerful. In all cases, school leaders must ensure that staff members and students understand appropriate boundaries, what their rights are, and that violations will be dealt with immediately and seriously.perptovic05

    A growing area of concern for educators and the people of our community is the diverse ethnic cultures within our university community.  York University is home to men and women of every ethno-cultural, religious and sexual background.  Because of this diversity we as a school could have higher incidents of sexual stereotyping. According to Shoop & Edwards (1994), ‘there are four preconditions that enhance the presence of stereotyping. These categories are rarity, priming, environment structure and ambience of the environment.’ (pg49). Being the only female in the class would be a good definition of rarity. To continue priming is a class or area on campus where you may see nude pictures, an area known for sexual slurs or even nude posing in the arts. Areas considered prime locations at York University are the athletic center, the first and second floor of the library and the various bars. What then will happen is that many people who converge to this area then become more aggressive and abusive towards women.

    If the faculty tends to ignore sexual harassment then the students will act by their views or actions thus forming a preconditioned law.  And finally stereotyping is the university’s promotion of women as sex objects. A prime example of this form of stereotyping was when a female law student filed charges against the faculty. It seemed that some male students had choreographed a play describing her as a slut who gives “head” to her professor for good grades. Nothing is being done because the actions of one potential assailant could destroy the integrity of the university. Moreover, female students still attend university at a greater number than male students. If figures show that we have a problem with crimes of harassment, abuse and assault, the university will mostly likely lose a large amount of money in the long term because female students will start to choose safer and more integrated programs. 

   According to Paludi (1996), ‘it is considered “bad” design if the people of color are not compared to white participants. The same demand is not required in studies with white samples. Thus, the experience of the white sample is considered the norm. (pg49) The same theory is used in analyzing our hypothesis. The case study was based on the answers of 20 white females, 20 black female, 20 East Indians, 20 East Africans, 20 Asian women, 20 women of Latin descent and 20 women of Middle-Eastern heritage. What is interesting about the questionnaire is that all the women believed that men harass, sexual abuse and assault women equally on campus. However, seventy five per cent of the white females believed that the Jewish males are the major assailant because they use economic position and subtle manipulative methods to abuse. More than 70 per cent of the women stated that race does play a role in the men they date.  Many of these women preferred to date white men and they also indicated that they would date any man if he had a lot of money.  The ladies also indicated that a woman’s economical situation and religious denomination was a strong factor in abuse. According to our questionnaire 60 percent believed that a woman who economically had less money than her partner stood a greater chance for abuse in a relationship or subtle forms of harassment. stat_02_03_1

   The answer to this question could be the female is more docile because women in general are taught to follow a man. Moreover, what is commonly understood is the male aggressor who is economical, sufficient, will seek out women he believes are inferior to him because of their economical status. This person may only be with this woman for her sexual practices and submissiveness. Her economic situation is one way of satisfying his power for control of another person. In the seventies when women started writing books on equality it was always the rich woman who captured the attention of the media. This early movement dealt with the dilemma of the rich educated white woman and her effortsts to be accepted within the corporate world. This movement did not focus on the physical and sexual abuse faced by lower and middle class women. In Canada women living in aboriginal communities and Muslim women still faces the horrors of violence and various forms of sexual abuse-these women have no support groups. Therefore, money certain ethnicity is an important factor in studying how young men and women communicate as equals.

    Our misconception may hold some truth in determining social factors to sexual misconducts such as rape and assault. About 60 per cent of the female population indicated that they would fear a black man late at night over any other male. Moreover, metropolitan police state that black people commit more crimes against other males. The black man was charged with assault with a weapon or robbery 71 per cent of the times. At the York university campus less than 5% of the sexual harassment, assault and rape cases were black. The top four offenders are Caucasian, Pakistani, Arabic and Asian. This is a society where sex is on display. The pornographic industry is a billion dollar industry. Furthermore, prostitution has been legalized in many gaming and casino areas in America. In today’s society we have male and female strip bars. Many occasions young women go to strip bars with men. Up until the early seventies a young woman would never enter a bar after 5 o’clock without a male chaperone. Our society is mired in the politics of sex. We have nude beaches, porn theatre and many of the adolescent and children’s television show are geared towards gender bias. Our children indirectly learn from what they view on televison and the internet. The entertainment industry is based on overt sexuality, violence and at times degradation of the female gender.      

    No one group is at fault for sexual harassment. However, the government does need to push for the educators to provide brochures and later on a half credit on sexual harassment and its criminal elements. This credit could be taken in a student final year of high school. It will then provide young women and men with a clearer understanding of what is wrong and right.  Furthermore, security should be hired on campus and they should be properly trained. According to metropolitan police, inexperienced security have often destroyed a crime scene or taken too long in calling the police. Most campus security has done the investigation by themselves and on occasion they have pressured the victim to drop the charges. The university owes it to all levels of our female faculty to put together a clearer meaning of sexual harassment.  So many people, myself included, taught that sexual harassment was rape or sexual assault. What I have learned is that this form of harassment is deeper than gender discrimination. Somehow we must make everyone aware of the consequences of harassment. More important all students should be ware that harassment is prominent in the transgender, gay, lesbian, male and female straight community.    sexual-harassment-statistic

 

 

 

 

Breakdown of cases according to the gender of the persons subjected to the harassment and the persons accused of harassment.

STATS CANADA:

    In conclusion this project has made me become more aware of my personal actions. Upon completing this assignment I realize that there is little effort by the Canadian government to control this problem. However, the Ontario government recognizes the first week of June as Sexual Harassment Awareness Week to increase awareness of sexual harassment, how to prevent it and to honour the memories of all women who have been victimized. Sexual harassment in workplaces and other settings is a serious form of violence against women in Ontario, and crosses every social boundary. I can only compare the spread of  harassment like the common cold because we have no cure but more important no deaths. Sexual harassment is a major problem at York University and the various campuses across Canada. This research as proven that sexual harassment should be defined as a serious offence-an-offence punishable by dismissal to the offender if proven guilty.        

 

 Courtney Duncan

butlerscotlanddet

“The sun never sets on the British empire”[1] was a phrase that meant that the British Empire was so extensive that, at any one time, at least part of its territory was in daylight. Guyana was a part of the British Empire. All Guyanese students are familiar with the rise of the British Empire in the eighteenth century. The term long eighteenth century is most commonly used by Guyanese scholars to assess the achievements of Great Britain. The Long eighteenth century was a period from 1688 to 1832. This period is generally depicted as Britain’s greatest triumph.

    In the centuries before the period of the long eighteenth century England, France and Spain generally fought between themselves for supremacy. For example the sixteenth century marked the time of Spanish dominance in Europe and the America’s. In the seventeenth century Britain witnessed the rise of Bourbon France and the eighteenth century was a century that welcomed colonial world power conflicts between old powers, as France, Spain, and England. Moreover, the time period of the eighteenth century fathered the first feelings of nationalism as these old regimes tried to balance each other’s power so that none would get to have an advantage.

    By the mid eighteenth century it was clear that the winner of this struggle would be the kingdom of Great Britain. What is remarkable to many scholars including myself is that this small island had survived the “bubonic” plague, the great fire of London in 1666, heavy taxes, and civil war. However, in less than seventy years Great Britain had put itself in position to rule the world. Many factors contributed to Great Britain rising to prominence. The true historian will base their arguments on Great Britain putting together a highly professional bureaucracy that believed in a sophisticated land and naval force that was later employed to protect the colonist. It was more than politics and military genius that forced Great Britain to the forefront. The common Englishman would point to the geographical location of Great Britain playing a role in its rise to prominence along with the decline of The Ottoman Empire.  Finally, the most important factor that contributed to this nation’s rise to prominence is the Industrial Revolution and the British government’s quiet involvement in the slave trade. This essay is written to identify the factors that transformed Britain from a second-rate to a first rate world power in the eighteenth century. The question is whether Britain’s political policy for success was also a cause of their decline. 

    “Eighteenth-century Europe can be described as states dancing together in temporary partnership until the music changed and old partners were deserted and new embraced. The eighteenth-century system was based on rivalry and alliances.”[2] Rulers sought to expand their power and territory through marriages. In Great Britain dynastic marriages were important but the main advantage the British had over the other European powers was the power of parliamentary government. “The origins of Parliament go back to the 13th century when the nobles would summon a parliament to discuss matters of disquiet to the barons and other prominent men of the realm.”[3] By 1649 parliament and Oliver Cromwell were powerful enough to behead Charles 1 for treason. For the next eleven years Britain was governed by Oliver Cromwell and his incompetent son Richard Cromwell. It was also parliament who had decided to recall the Stuart lineage. By 1679 an exclusion bill to exclude James II was introduced. This parliament was called the First Exclusion Parliament.

   The evolution of the common man in politics is a significant factor to the cohesion or stability of the British parliament in the eighteenth century. By the eighteenth century Great Britain’s peasant society and working class had achieved far greater privileges than their counter-part on the continent. Further evidence of this statement would be the Peasant Revolt of 1381. On the contrary the middle and lower classes of France only gained their independence in 1789. By the early seventeen hundreds, Britain had established sophisticated political factions who served the nobility and the common people. In this new kingdom men could rise from nothing to become exceptionally rich and powerful. The poor and middle class man could speak his mind on religion, and politics without any fear of being imprisoned or hanged by their respective institutions. This cannot be said of the great kingdoms of Spain and France.

    Political parties in power such as the Whigs and Tories functioned by checking the power of the monarchy. This gave the ruling government an opportunity to create wealth for the nation and government. On the contrary countries such as Spain had to deal with the Inquisition and divine rule of the monarchy. Furthermore, the opposition to the British political system in Europe was feudal in their political thoughts. In Spain Inquisition dominance stifled the social and political growth of that country. In contrast parliamentary rule enabled Britain to manage its resources and balance the national debt. This ingenuity encouraged migration of rich merchants from other parts of Europe to invest in the economy of Great Britain and the development of London as the business capital of the known world as it was in the eighteenth century. These expansions were instrumental in moving the World Bank from Amsterdam to London in the eighteenth century.    

     The Whig party is recognized in establishing the kingdom of Great Britain. “The Whigs were instrumental in pushing a bill which would exclude all catholic sovereigns from taking the throne of England after the death of James the 2nd. This act is known as the Act of Settlement 1701. Furthermore, the Whig party along with Tory engineered the Act of Settlement act of Union in 1707.”[4] The Act of Union incorporated Scotland into a union with Britain and it further nullified the freedom of monarchs to rule without a government. The power gained by the Whigs and Tories quickly established liberty within the new Kingdom.

   In Great Britain a monarch had to call parliament to gain support for certain endeavors. Moreover, local governments ruled without much control from central governments. “The powers exercised by the two governments made it less time consuming to pass certain laws and to raise taxes. The people only had contact with government on local levels unless they were taken into the armed services.”[5] This meant that the taxes collected were controlled and they were rarely used to fill the treasury of the monarch. 

   Taxes were important because they supported the army, the poor and they were used to ‘build bridges and fix roads. The population in Great Britain was helped because of poor relief. The poor relief was tax money the government collected that was eventually used to feed the homeless and the poor. Furthermore, this made Great Britain a much more unified and grounded nation than the rest of Europe.

   Sir Robert Walpole is Great Britain’s first prime minister and greatest political leader. “Walpole rose to power as a Whig M.P. from 1700 to 1721”[6]  Sir Robert Walpole is famous for handling the stock market crash of 1720. This crisis is known as the South Sea “bubble.” Walpole limited political damage by honoring the debt.  The country of France had a similar crisis however it was much more damaging to their market.  Walpole never favored war and the British people were constantly at war during the period of the eighteenth century. The monarch usually influenced parliament; however the final decision for war was a vote. “In 1701 the war of the “Spanish Succession” began.  “When Charles 2nd died in 1700, he left a will expressing his desire that his diminished empire “remain” intact and that Louis 14th grandson, Philip of Anjou, succeed him.”[7]  This was an easy decision for British parliament who along with Queen Anne feared the consolidation of Bourbon France with Hapsburg Spain. This war involved all the great states of Europe. It was the first known world war because the battle was fought in Europe, Africa, India and the Americas. By the signing of the treaty of Utrecht (1713) it appeared that France and Philip had done better on the bargaining table. This treaty laid the foundations for Great Britain taking full possession of New France by 1763. 

     In 1746 Britain fought their last war on their own natural soil.  At the battle of “Culloden” Charles Stuart was crushed and sent packing to France. The battle of Culloden was the Stuart line’s last claim to the throne of Great Britain. This is instrumental because for centuries countries such as Spain and France would always support independent states like Scotland and lesser extent Ireland to rise up against England. They were many other battles lost and won by Great Britain in the period of the eighteenth century. War was heavily financed from the taxes of the colonies taken by Great Britain. This added revenue contributed to the building of more and better naval vessels for exploration, war and defense. War was costly. However, war laid the foundations for the Anglo-Saxon empire and domination of the world. CANADA/

     Britain was an Anglo-Saxon empire forged with the blood of the landed gentry, common people and the nobility. This rise to prominence was further achieved by nature and the decline of old religious enemies such as the Ottoman Empire. “The Ottoman Turks captured Constantinople after a lengthy siege in 1453, and by 1481, the Ottoman Turkish Empire extended to the Danube River in Central Europe.”[8]  Islam would continue to be a threat to Christianity. “The Ottoman Turks commanded the Black Sea and the northern Aegean and many prime trade routes had been closed to European shipping.”[9] The Islamic threat loomed even larger with incorporation of the janissary soldiers. These soldiers were influential in winning great wars for the Sultans. However, by the eighteenth century the janissaries began to raise political war against the Sultans. By the mid eighteenth century they had risen to an astronomical number of 130,000. They were eventually killed by the Sultan. It was soon after the massacre of this secretive warrior sect that the Ottoman Empire declined. With the fall of the Ottoman Empire the trade route to the east was now controlled by England.  Further evidence of the decline of Ottoman rule playing a factor in European and Great Britain expansion east is the attempt of Britain to align Egypt with India. These were all territories within Ottoman sea ports. The Ottoman decline opened the door for Hapsburg Austria to control the Balkans. This is an important statement because the powerful Austrian Hapsburg had joined in union with Great Britain to disband the Spanish Hapsburg succession.   

      Political alliances were not the only reason for Great Britain’s success in the eighteenth century. Not since the year 1066 had an army successfully landed on British soil. In 1688 William 1st successfully landed an army in London. He won the day without a shot being fired. Over the centuries Great Britain’s waterways have proven too tricky to conquer. Invading armies have had to maneuver the rough Irish Sea, Atlantic Ocean and narrow river Thames. The leading European powers on the continent did not have the luxury of being an island. They had to spend a large sum in the upkeep of forts and troops to defend their borders.

    It was not only the huge sums of money spent by rival European powers in protecting their homeland that gave Britain an advantage for economic dominance. By the eighteenth century the trading route soon switched to the Atlantic.  In early colonial settlement, goods came from two main sources:  England and Africa. “A typical system of goods would consist of cloth, rum or weapons. These goods would be traded for black people. Many of the slaves died during transportation to the colonies-they were, tightly packed in disease invested compartments. Many died of malaria, or scurvy.”[10]  Once in the colony, the ship would unload the slaves and take on any or all of molasses, sugar or tobacco and then head to Great Britain, completing the triangular trade.      british-empire-333

   “Slave ships brought the occasional slave back to England and advertisement offering slaves for sale were seen in Liverpool and Bristol newspapers.”[11]  “In the eighteenth century sugar was Britain’s largest import by value and per capita consumption of sugar reached a level of between 16 and 24 pounds per annum during the eighteenth century.”[12]  West Indian sugar made huge profits for the British all around the world. Slavery in the colonies grew in numbers. “Many British people would borrow money to start small and large plantations. In 1671-1775 a total of one 1.75 million slaves were transported to the British colonies.”[13] The selling of slaves to the colonist and exchange of natural goods, proved lucrative for the British government. Although slavery was ruled illegal on English soil in the late seventeen hundreds the law was not passed in the colony until the late 1830s. Slavery generated much needed money to reduce the national debt in Great Britain. It was a win situation for many of the parliamentary members many of whom had invested large sums of money in building plantation businesses in the colonies. Great Britain reduced the national debt by taxing the colonies and ignoring the atrocities of slavery.

   With the coming of the Industrial Revolution in the eighteenth century Great Britain realized the value in new inventions-these innovations were used to cultivate more crops. The industrial revolution of the 18th century dramatically changed the function of industry. These new innovations were machines, fresh sources of power and energy, and the construction of assembly style lines. Industrialism improved the quality of the goods and it increased production of finished goods to be sold in the various markets. Many people speculate why industrialism occurred first in Great Britain.

    The Industrial Revolution began in Great Britain because people had more freedom to explore and expand on ideas. It was the Whig Oligarchy of the early 1700s that established a new law on patents for inventions. Moreover, monarchs could not control or seize earnings or impose taxes. This freedom enabled Britain to become masters of the world. The freedom achieved in this period more than anything gave the people of Great Britain an identity. The Industrial Revolution changed the world for good. Great Britain’s factories on the outskirts of its cities, the tall chimneys smoking by day and glowing by night, the incessant hum of machinery, the bustle of crowds of workmen, all these were familiar to eighteenth century Britons.[14] Just a few short years before the Industrial Revolution, the population changed greatly in Great Britain. People began to migrate from the rural and far country side in search of jobs in the bigger industrialized British cities. This revolution created and eliminated competition between old rivalries such as Holland.

a1_d_2_4-gr3_lrg

    Earlier in this journal we spoke of Britain’s triumph across the seas. By the eighteenth century Great Britain had the ability to obtain an abundance of natural resources and minerals from the territories they won in conquest. These commodities were then brought back to Britain where they were mass produced in factories across the island. The increased production usually meant availability for the British colonists and the rest of the world. It also destroyed the competition because the British market could sell products at a cheaper than normal price. The most important commodities of British export were wool, metal, porcelain potteries and refined sugar. “However, the factory system also improved on the silk industry, which was borrowed from Italy, and brought to a London suburb by French refugees, after the repeal of the Edict of Nantes.”[15] The preconditions for industrialization can be classified as economic, social, and cultural. As mentioned earlier British banks became the center for world economy. Furthermore, the industrial era created advances in steam power, iron metallurgy and mechanical devices for spinning and weaving. “Very few of the early inventors were scientists: James Hargreaves, who invented the spinning jenny, was a carpenter; Edmund Cartwright, who developed the power loom, was a preacher and many others, including Abraham Darby a businessman who learned by doing.”[16] This was the British way of doing things; a new freedom not seen in any other European country.

   Industrialism also changed the family structure in that women could now seek opportunities to work in the factories. This monumental change occurred with the improvement of the loom. Gone were the days of spinning at home. During the industrial period the wealth of the nation tripled and the British people earned the unheralded title of Empire maker. This domination was envisioned in every aspect of life. This was so because with the improvement of the loom-women moved from spinning at home to within factories. The improvements were to be found everywhere in the manufacturers’ world. Ethically or culturally the British could do no wrong. The accolade was owed to the brilliant men of this period who now made Britain the centre for education, technological advances, and new cultural world capital. The great philosophers of the period such as David Hume, Adam Smith and Thomas Paine; these men were born and bred in the spirit of the British Empire.

    Britain’s presence is felt in the eighteenth century. We understand that an empire can only be developed by individuals from all levels of society. In Great Britain the government created private companies to whom the government and monarch granted exclusive rights to trade in a particular part of the world. Examples of these companies are the Hudson Bay Company, East India Company and the Royal Africa Company. Many people were given opportunities to invest in these companies.

ship_monamy_550

   When the population of Britain exploded many people migrated to The Americas and other regions to seek their fortune. By the second stage of the empire white citizens who were raised in these regions started to gain control of their administration. This is an important time period because these second class British citizens started to resent the system instituted by the Empire. Their major concern was taxes in the Americas, Caribbean and India. In the region of India the British achieved great wealth at the expense of the peasant farmers and middle class population. In Great Britain’s colonies the colonists were angry at a Britain they felt had forgotten the prime directive. This directive was a fair balance of taxes and freedom to grow. The British had forgotten where they had come from and Britons were now draining the blood of their own brothers and sisters. With the episode of the French revolution, America took notice and gained their independence in 1776 from Great Britain. The British rulers could not fathom future wealth and power within America. It would take another 300 years for the British Empire to finally subside in the 1970s.

 In summary Great Britain proved to be a better negotiator at the peace table than the other European powers. Britain would use these negotiation skills to divide the potential power of their foes. A prime example of this was how they blocked the Bourbon claim to unify Hapsburg Spain with France and their generous financial gifts to weaker Protestant states within the territory of Europe. This proved effective in neutralizing the powerful Absolute states of Europe.   

 This world has witnessed many great achievements and people have benefited or suffered from Imperial rule. The British can never give back the money or capital stolen by a system centuries ago. The black, red and yellow man can only be thankful that they have gained back their lands. However sad this story may be, many people are still proud to be part of the Commonwealth.

Courtney Duncan

                   

 

 

 

 

        

 

   

           `           


[1] Simon Winchester, The Sun Never Sets: Travels to the Remaining Outposts of the British Empire (New York. N.Y): Prentice Hall Press, 1985), xvii

 

 

[2] John Merriman, A history Of Modern Europe: From The Renaissance To The Present (New York N.Y.): Library of Congress Catalog-in-Publication Data, 1996), p.444  

[3] Stanford E. Lehmberg and Samantha A. Meigs, From Prehistoric Times to 1688: The Peoples of the British Isles: A New History (Chicago, Illinois: Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data, 2001), p79

[4] Merriman, A History of Modern Europe, p446.

[5] Thomas W Heyck, The People of the British Isles A New History: From 1688 to 1870 (Chicago, Illinois): Lyceum Books Inc, 2002), p69

[6] Heyck, The People of the British Isles, p74.

[7] Merriman, A History OF Modern Europe, p320

[8] Merriman, A History of Modern Europe, p7

[9] “The End of Europe’s Middle Ages,” Ottoman Turk, http://www.ucalgary.ca/applied_history/tutor/endmiddle/FRAMES/ottoframe.html (accessed February 2, 2009).

[10]  History of Britain II, the wars of the British,1603-1776. Volume 6, The wrong empire// written and presented by 
Schama, Simon: a BBC production in association with the History channel.

[11] David Eltis, The Rise of Slavery in the Americas (New York, NY): Cambridge University Press, 2000), p.1

[12] Ralph Davies, The Industrial Revolution and British Overseas Trade (Leicester, Leicester County): Leicester University Press, 1979) Table 27, p.45.

[13]( History of Britain II, the wars of the British,1603-1776. Volume 6, The wrong empire, 2002)

[14] T.S. Ashton & John Kenneth Galbraith, Paul Mantoux: The Industrial Revolution in The eighteenth century: An outline of the beginnings of the modern factory system in England. (Chicago, Illinois: The Chicago University Press, 1990), pg25

[15] Ashton & Galbraith, The Industrial Revolution, pg 104

[16] Heyck, the People of the British Isles, pg 188

Older Posts »